# Which models are offered on a plan and when (`models.catalog_access`)

Feedback Bench, coding agents, built 2026-10-19, window 2026-08-31 to 2026-10-18. Web page: https://feedbackbench.com/coding-agents/#/criterion/models.catalog_access

Area: [Choosing models](https://feedbackbench.com/coding-agents/criteria/models.md)

**Definition.** Whether models are available on the user's plan: same-day support for new releases, deprecations and removals, multi-provider choice, and models missing from a surface.

**Boundary.** Not this: see [Free tier and free model availability and limits](https://feedbackbench.com/coding-agents/criteria/billing.free_tier.md) for free-model availability. Not this: see [Automatic model routing and fallback](https://feedbackbench.com/coding-agents/criteria/models.routing_auto.md) for which model actually runs.

Rated user-weeks, all agents: 3013. Complaint share: 74%.

## The brief

Written by large language models from this page's numbers and the posts it quotes, then checked: every number in the text is in the build. Interpretation, not measurement.

OpenCode is the best at offering the models users want. Users say new models, including stealth models, reach it quickly, and that it offers models other tools hold back. Devin, Factory, GitHub Copilot and Claude Code also rank high. Their users describe one subscription that reaches models from many providers. Model choice is the 12th most rated of 63 criteria, and most ratings of it are complaints. Google Antigravity ranks last, OpenAI Codex 10th and Kiro 9th, and all three rank low. Google Antigravity users write 32% of the category's complaints here, and OpenAI Codex users write 29%.

### What separates the best from the rest

Users of the agents that rank high say a single plan covers models from many providers, and that new and stealth models arrive early. Users of the agents that rank low describe waiting. Google Antigravity users say a flagship model is missing from the paid plan they hold. Kiro and OpenAI Codex users say announced models take days to reach them. Some OpenAI Codex users say a model works on one surface but not on another.

- **Ranks high**: [Claude Code](https://feedbackbench.com/coding-agents/agents/claude-code.md), [Devin](https://feedbackbench.com/coding-agents/agents/devin.md), [OpenCode](https://feedbackbench.com/coding-agents/agents/opencode.md), [Factory](https://feedbackbench.com/coding-agents/agents/factory.md), [GitHub Copilot](https://feedbackbench.com/coding-agents/agents/copilot.md)
  - OpenCode, 2026-10-15, r/opencode (Reddit): “they are very fast with bringing new models! i have used so many stealth models on opencode, that otherwise i wouldn't even know about” [source](https://www.reddit.com/r/opencode/comments/1x6ivix/round_of_applause_to_opencode/pgwifok/)
  - Devin, 2026-10-13, @DevinAI (X): “@nando_g_ai @devinai i think right now it's the best for having all models in one.” [source](https://twitter.com/2034540258365489152/status/2110079410791485450)
- **Ranks low**: [OpenAI Codex](https://feedbackbench.com/coding-agents/agents/codex.md), [Kiro](https://feedbackbench.com/coding-agents/agents/kiro.md), [Google Antigravity](https://feedbackbench.com/coding-agents/agents/antigravity.md)
  - Google Antigravity, 2026-10-18, @antigravity (X): “@antigravity cap of the year. i didnt see any gemini 4 agron in my antigravity. im pro user” [source](https://twitter.com/1644670135226212354/status/2111820271577682128)
  - OpenAI Codex, 2026-10-12, r/codex (Reddit): “i have the same issue, i think maybe it’s the gradual rollout? i even didn’t have 6.1 ultrafast for 4 days after tibos announcement which was pretty infuriating given it’s $500 a month so i would expect at least access within a couple hours.” [source](https://www.reddit.com/r/codex/comments/1x4a574/why_do_i_never_get_the_new_features_by_default/pfi2mqy/)

## How it breaks

Rule: A separate pass sorts complaints into failure modes. For each criterion with at least 30 complaining user-weeks, a large language model reads 150 complaint posts drawn at random and names 4 to 8 failure modes; a second large language model then puts every complaint post on that criterion in one mode, or in Other when it fits none. Modes are fixed once named, and new posts are sorted into them each week. A mode counts distinct user-weeks with a complaint in it, per agent; across agents, one user-week per agent. Modes do not change the labels or the Feedback Score. Examples: up to 3 posts per mode from different users, chosen and checked as receipts are.

The largest failure mode is a model held back from the user's paid plan while other tiers or regions get it. It accounts for 24% of complaining user-weeks, and Google Antigravity users write 50% of them. Google Antigravity also leads complaints about models removed without warning. OpenAI Codex users write 59% of complaints about a new model that works on one surface but not another. OpenAI Codex also leads complaints about slow rollouts that leave paying users waiting.

2261 complaining user-weeks.

| Failure mode | User-weeks | Posts | Agents (user-weeks) | Definition |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model withheld from user's plan tier | 552 | 588 | Google Antigravity 277, OpenAI Codex 123, Claude Code 50, OpenCode 38, Cursor 33, GitHub Copilot 14, Kiro 8, Amp 3, Devin 3, Cline 2, Pi 1 | A model the user expects is locked out of their paid tier, enterprise license, partner-bundled or regional plan, or reaches them only at lower reasoning settings, while other tiers or regions get it; this excludes rollout delays that hit every plan equally. |
| Staggered rollout leaves paying users waiting | 419 | 437 | OpenAI Codex 184, Google Antigravity 107, OpenCode 59, Kiro 23, Claude Code 15, Cursor 12, Cline 4, GitHub Copilot 4, Factory 3, Amp 2, Conductor 2, Pi 2, Devin 1, Zed 1 | A model has been announced and others already have it, but the user still has no access days or weeks later, with no timeline or explanation, despite updating and reinstalling; this excludes models that are permanently restricted to certain plans. |
| Model removed or deprecated without warning | 378 | 407 | Google Antigravity 184, OpenAI Codex 63, Cursor 55, OpenCode 42, Claude Code 18, GitHub Copilot 10, Kiro 3, Pi 2, Amp 1 | A model the user relied on is removed, replaced or cut from their plan, or a whole provider leaves the tool, which breaks configs and workflows or erases usage history; this excludes models that were never offered. |
| New model missing from one surface | 243 | 258 | OpenAI Codex 144, Google Antigravity 60, OpenCode 19, Cursor 5, Pi 3, Claude Code 2, Cline 2, Factory 2, Kiro 2, Amp 1, Conductor 1, Devin 1, Zed 1 | A newly released model can be used on one surface of the same product (web, CLI, mobile, cloud) but not on another, such as the desktop app or the Linux build, even after the user updates; this excludes cases where the model is missing everywhere because of the user's plan or region. |
| Third-party frontier models absent or outdated | 219 | 230 | Cursor 65, Google Antigravity 63, OpenCode 25, OpenAI Codex 19, Claude Code 15, Kiro 13, Cline 5, GitHub Copilot 4, Factory 3, Zed 3, Devin 2, Amp 1, Pi 1 | The tool's model catalog leaves out current models from other providers, or only offers versions that are generations old, while it pushes its own models; this excludes problems with the vendor's own new releases. |
| Listed model unselectable or returns unavailable | 212 | 221 | OpenAI Codex 77, OpenCode 59, Google Antigravity 29, Cursor 17, Claude Code 11, GitHub Copilot 4, Pi 3, Zed 3, Devin 2, Factory 2, Kiro 2, Amp 1, Cline 1, Conductor 1 | A model appears in the picker or is advertised for the plan, but selecting it fails, returns 'model unavailable' or HTTP 400 errors, or gets silently swapped, which also covers suspicion that a different model is being served; this excludes models missing from the list entirely. |
| Limited multi-provider choice and configuration | 165 | 176 | Cursor 55, OpenCode 29, Google Antigravity 23, OpenAI Codex 23, Claude Code 8, Pi 6, Amp 5, GitHub Copilot 5, Conductor 4, Factory 3, Kiro 2, Devin 1, Zed 1 | The tool does not let users bring other providers or models, hides models the account can reach behind a hardcoded list, or removes per-provider model whitelisting, so users turn to proxies or other harnesses; this excludes complaints about the quality of particular models. |
| Other | 157 | 158 | OpenAI Codex 44, Cursor 35, Google Antigravity 25, Claude Code 20, OpenCode 15, Devin 5, GitHub Copilot 3, Amp 2, Cline 2, Conductor 2, Kiro 2, Factory 1, Zed 1 | Complaints that fit none of the modes above. |

#### Model withheld from user's plan tier

- Google Antigravity, 2026-10-18, r/google_antigravity (Reddit): “when you have literally every model available to you - of course argon would not be so impressive. meanwhile, people were stuck with half baked 3.1 pro preview and flash models. some, including me, still sadly do.” [source](https://www.reddit.com/r/google_antigravity/comments/1x8x6nn/dont_worry_too_much_argon_its_genuinely_not_that/phiufdb/)
- Google Antigravity, 2026-10-18, r/google_antigravity (Reddit): “claude models? paid pro, argon? paid pro, student benefit pro for 1 year? nope” [source](https://www.reddit.com/r/google_antigravity/comments/1x8unih/watching_google_ais_reputation_bounce_back_and/phijzvw/)
- Google Antigravity, 2026-10-18, r/google_antigravity (Reddit): “for me, my personal experience with antigravity is an an ultimate low. i am still locked out of argon everywhere (antigravity desktop and cli) except for gemini with my paid pro account.” [source](https://www.reddit.com/r/google_antigravity/comments/1x8unih/watching_google_ais_reputation_bounce_back_and/phgfjtr/)

#### Staggered rollout leaves paying users waiting

- Google Antigravity, 2026-10-18, @antigravity (X): “@antigravity cap of the year. i didnt see any gemini 4 agron in my antigravity. im pro user” [source](https://twitter.com/1644670135226212354/status/2111820271577682128)
- Google Antigravity, 2026-10-17, @antigravity (X): “@geminiapp @antigravity hey, argon has been out for a week, why do i still not have access to it on antigravity ide? i have a ultra plan, and we are the last people to get access to it? wtf, why do you assume everyone wants to use your antigravity agentic app? [link]” [source](https://twitter.com/2625078508/status/2111500180721913868)
- Google Antigravity, 2026-10-17, @antigravity (X): “i can't see gemini argon in antigravity in my pro plan. i've updated antigravity to the latest version now and still can't see it.@googleaistudio @antigravity @google i anyone experiencing the same issue? [link] [link]” [source](https://twitter.com/1802615717692309504/status/2111404943504711920)

#### Model removed or deprecated without warning

- Google Antigravity, 2026-10-17, r/google_antigravity (Reddit): “what does it mean to buy the pro plan and remove the pro model in antigravity?” [source](https://www.reddit.com/r/google_antigravity/comments/1x53qb4/will_gemini_4_argon_be_available_on_the/phd8jou/)
- Google Antigravity, 2026-10-16, @antigravity (X): “@antigravity nah, google, what exactly is going on with antigravity? when you gave users google ai pro trials, we had access to frontier models like claude opus 4.6, sonnet 4.6 and others. those models were part of the actual experience we got under pro” [source](https://twitter.com/3370360581/status/2111003310425841786)
- Google Antigravity, 2026-10-15, r/google_antigravity (Reddit): “the real problem is not that 4 isn't available in antigravity for pro users, but that 3.1 pro has been removed. there's no model more suitable for planning available unless (i assume) you use a payg api key.” [source](https://www.reddit.com/r/google_antigravity/comments/1x6gz05/unacceptable_ai_pro_downgrade_antigravity_cli/pgz4ndq/)

#### New model missing from one surface

- Google Antigravity, 2026-10-18, @antigravity (X): “@geminiapp wtf is wrong with your subscriptions. i have pro subscription, i can use argon in mobile app and web browser but no in antigravity, that shit says "only available to pro susbscribers", how many pro accounts do i need. you guys are a f**king joke! @antigravity” [source](https://twitter.com/1591074202072715264/status/2111905911858167973)
- Google Antigravity, 2026-10-18, @antigravity (X): “@antigravity it seems that i'm the only one in the world still using antigravity ide. why can't argon be used in the ide yet?” [source](https://twitter.com/984631526980816896/status/2111852939526775290)
- Google Antigravity, 2026-10-17, r/google_antigravity (Reddit): “why don't i have gemini 4 in the pro plan? wtf i only have it in the gemini search. not in gravity cli.” [source](https://www.reddit.com/r/google_antigravity/comments/1x70nez/gemini_4_argon_for_pro_users_has_a_different/phcn8iu/)

#### Third-party frontier models absent or outdated

- Cursor, 2026-10-13, r/cursor (Reddit): “i agree. i went with a grok plan for the sole purpose of grokbot and left my cursor ultra. i was thinking of coming back but now, no way. no 3rd party models, not worth it.” [source](https://www.reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1x4or37/cursor_new_plans_and_major_changes/pggwo7y/)
- Cursor, 2026-10-13, r/cursor (Reddit): “and there it goes. my whole use case for cursor was not having to choose one ecosystem and now it's just another single model product, but with a much worse model than the competition. time to start checking out competitors.” [source](https://www.reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1x4or37/cursor_new_plans_and_major_changes/pggda0b/)
- Google Antigravity, 2026-10-11, r/google_antigravity (Reddit): “antigravity will just be gemini flash after 2nd nov, third party models will be gone, i have bundled pro account so i will be only left with flash 3.8 too bad no sonnet opus 5.5.” [source](https://www.reddit.com/r/google_antigravity/comments/1x33an3/unpopular_opinion_90_of_the_hate_toward_google/pf9z2fu/)

#### Listed model unselectable or returns unavailable

- OpenCode, 2026-10-16, @opencode (X): “@opencode i have both go and zen creds. it still says go subscription needed, log shows 403 . i think this has become like nvidia nim models” [source](https://twitter.com/1077063246513721344/status/2111140545183805447)
- Google Antigravity, 2026-10-16, @antigravity (X): “but @antigravity and "agy" don't recognize any access to argon or any paid models? [link]” [source](https://twitter.com/17686110/status/2111124359003689191)
- Google Antigravity, 2026-10-16, @antigravity (X): “@salcastt @antigravity that’s what the alleged “try gemini 4” button does (turns on 3.8 “thinking”). argon continues to be unavailable for many ultra subscribers without explanation.” [source](https://twitter.com/2767862064/status/2111091666987995468)

#### Limited multi-provider choice and configuration

- Cursor, 2026-10-18, @cursor_ai (X): “grok 4.7 is very buggy for a frontier model! and with the new subscription model, @cursor_ai has no alternatives now... so sad. i understand that part of the team has had huge product success with @bot, but it's really disappointing that cursor itself is struggling.” [source](https://twitter.com/967976754890657792/status/2111888769683169769)
- Cursor, 2026-10-13, r/cursor (Reddit): “people are allowed to have preferences. that is why many of us started using cursor because we can have preferences. now we have to only what musk prefers and pay him for it. no thanks.” [source](https://www.reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1x57zof/comment/pgkxoak/)

#### Other

- Cursor, 2026-10-16, r/cursor (Reddit): “yeah but it's pretty useless as all the large models force you to use max mode. so you can normally only use models like haiku, luna, etc” [source](https://www.reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1x7dos2/final_thoughts_on_cursor/ph6zr5l/)

## Top requests

What users ask to add or change, most asked first. 2421 user-weeks ask for something. Requests do not change the Feedback Score. Rule: A separate pass by a large language model reads every counted post and extracts what the user asks the agent or its vendor to add or change, with the criteria it maps to and a short normalised wording; it does not touch the labels or the Feedback Score. A large language model groups the wordings within each criterion (the first criterion the request maps to) into themes, and a second pass merges themes that ask for the same change under different criteria; a merged theme sits under the criterion most of its requests map to, and code counts it once. A theme counts distinct user-weeks that ask for it, per agent; across agents, one user-week per agent. Themes asked in fewer than 2 user-weeks, and requests that share no theme, are not shown. Examples: up to 3 posts per theme from different users, without slurs: whole posts of 60 to 450 characters with at least 8 words beyond handles and links, posts of at most 280 characters first, then the newest.

| Rank | Request | User-weeks | Posts | Agents (user-weeks) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Newest flagship model on the Pro plan | 203 | 228 | Google Antigravity 183, Claude Code 12, OpenAI Codex 6, GitHub Copilot 1, OpenCode 1 |
| 2 | Restore removed models | 128 | 137 | OpenAI Codex 44, Google Antigravity 32, Cursor 16, Claude Code 14, OpenCode 13, Devin 4, Amp 2, GitHub Copilot 2, Cline 1 |
| 3 | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash model support | 108 | 111 | OpenCode 56, Cursor 11, Factory 10, Kiro 6, Zed 6, Cline 5, OpenAI Codex 5, GitHub Copilot 3, Devin 3, Claude Code 2, Amp 1 |
| 4 | Multi-provider model support | 98 | 101 | OpenAI Codex 22, Cursor 20, Google Antigravity 18, Claude Code 12, Zed 9, Pi 5, Amp 4, OpenCode 3, Kiro 2, Cline 1, GitHub Copilot 1, Factory 1 |
| 5 | Cheaper lightweight model option | 95 | 99 | OpenAI Codex 42, Claude Code 13, Google Antigravity 12, Cursor 10, OpenCode 9, Kiro 4, GitHub Copilot 2, Devin 2, Factory 1 |
| 6 | Keep older models available | 93 | 100 | Google Antigravity 33, OpenAI Codex 27, Claude Code 14, OpenCode 8, Cursor 7, Devin 2, GitHub Copilot 1, Zed 1 |
| 7 | Astra model availability | 88 | 89 | OpenAI Codex 41, Cursor 25, Kiro 9, OpenCode 6, Amp 2, Cline 2, Conductor 1, Devin 1, Zed 1 |
| 8 | Opus 5.5 model support | 84 | 94 | Kiro 29, Google Antigravity 27, OpenCode 7, Amp 5, Claude Code 4, OpenAI Codex 4, Cursor 2, Devin 2, Pi 2, Cline 1, Conductor 1 |
| 9 | Release Gemini 4 / Argon models | 84 | 92 | Google Antigravity 79, Cline 1, OpenAI Codex 1, Cursor 1, Devin 1, Factory 1 |
| 10 | Faster addition of newly released models | 76 | 79 | OpenAI Codex 19, Google Antigravity 15, Kiro 13, Claude Code 8, Cursor 6, Cline 4, GitHub Copilot 3, OpenCode 3, Pi 2, Conductor 1, Factory 1, Zed 1 |
| 11 | Gated features on lower plans | 74 | 75 | Claude Code 32, OpenAI Codex 21, Google Antigravity 7, Cursor 5, Factory 4, OpenCode 2, Conductor 1, Devin 1, Kiro 1 |
| 12 | GPT-6 Sol and Luna model support | 73 | 75 | OpenAI Codex 39, OpenCode 9, Kiro 6, Amp 5, Cursor 5, Claude Code 3, GitHub Copilot 2, Pi 2, Google Antigravity 1, Zed 1 |

### 1. Newest flagship model on the Pro plan

- Google Antigravity, 2026-10-18, @antigravity (X): “@antigravity it seems that i'm the only one in the world still using antigravity ide. why can't argon be used in the ide yet?” [source](https://twitter.com/984631526980816896/status/2111852939526775290)
- Google Antigravity, 2026-10-18, @antigravity (X): “@antigravity what about of antigravity ide, can you add argon here?” [source](https://twitter.com/1945835400213200897/status/2111783502928576877)
- Google Antigravity, 2026-10-17, r/google_antigravity (Reddit): “why don't i have gemini 4 in the pro plan? wtf i only have it in the gemini search. not in gravity cli.” [source](https://www.reddit.com/r/google_antigravity/comments/1x70nez/gemini_4_argon_for_pro_users_has_a_different/phcn8iu/)

### 2. Restore removed models

- Google Antigravity, 2026-10-17, @antigravity (X): “@antigravity bring back 3.1 pro. argon was way too much for some simple task, flash on the other hand was not it for long task” [source](https://twitter.com/941670051060391936/status/2111500033157906638)
- Google Antigravity, 2026-10-15, r/google_antigravity (Reddit): “the real problem is not that 4 isn't available in antigravity for pro users, but that 3.1 pro has been removed. there's no model more suitable for planning available unless (i assume) you use a payg api key.” [source](https://www.reddit.com/r/google_antigravity/comments/1x6gz05/unacceptable_ai_pro_downgrade_antigravity_cli/pgz4ndq/)
- Google Antigravity, 2026-10-15, r/google_antigravity (Reddit): “3.8 is kind of just... the king of overcomplicating and getting everything wrong. it's pretty annoying imo. 3.7 was pretty dope. would like it back too.” [source](https://www.reddit.com/r/google_antigravity/comments/1x5yzgi/please_bring_back_gemini_37_flash/pgti28a/)

### 3. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash model support

- OpenCode, 2026-10-18, @opencode (X): “yo @opencode... good luck on the security but... new deepseek flash wen? 👉 👈 🥺” [source](https://twitter.com/944978898927964161/status/2111694862244528226)
- OpenCode, 2026-10-17, r/opencode (Reddit): “when would be have deepseek 4.1 flash 1017 on go plan? thanks !” [source](https://www.reddit.com/r/opencode/comments/1x8i228/when_would_be_have_deepseek_41_flash_1017_on_go/)
- OpenCode, 2026-10-17, @opencode (X): “@opencode we need dsf4.1 1017! will top up on another plus for that” [source](https://twitter.com/1673923312119074817/status/2111527135353635153)

### 4. Multi-provider model support

- Google Antigravity, 2026-10-18, @antigravity (X): “@antigravity using only antigravity with gemini it's complicated, we have to use two or three a.i. to get the result..... antigravity it's amazing but again, use sonnet and gpt together” [source](https://twitter.com/1556470074982252547/status/2111786091950874743)
- Amp, 2026-10-16, @AmpCode (X): “hey @ampcode any plans to add junie from jetbrains ai to the model routing?” [source](https://twitter.com/316180959/status/2111144040406397309)
- Cursor, 2026-10-16, @cursor_ai (X): “@cursor_ai @spacexai i have been on the legacy plan, which is more perfect for me. i upgraded my plan and i realized that i could only access composer and grok models, which isn't suits my work at all.” [source](https://twitter.com/1163109596610928641/status/2111080897373946337)

### 5. Cheaper lightweight model option

- Kiro, 2026-10-17, @kirodotdev (X): “@kirodotdev i guess it’s too pricey. i think we need a lower, faster model, like haiku 5.5. or deepseek 4.1 flash” [source](https://twitter.com/192627237/status/2111261218157830550)
- OpenAI Codex, 2026-10-16, X search: OpenAI Codex, Codex CLI, Codex app (X): “6.1 although it's called astra, i hope it has good token efficiency like opus 5.5 and is as capable as 5.6 sol, tibo 🤞 that's astra, and only then will openai regain its top position 💐 #gpt61 #astra #openai #codex #chatgpt [link]” [source](https://twitter.com/1578547063318454272/status/2111136833514217573)
- Cursor, 2026-10-16, @cursor_ai (X): “@cursor_ai we want composer 3 and a cheap model at 0.10/0.50 like haiku 5.5.” [source](https://twitter.com/789888781059035136/status/2111077594284134430)

### 6. Keep older models available

- Google Antigravity, 2026-10-18, @antigravity (X): “@antigravity it would have been better if sonnet 4.6 had remained available on promotional plans even after november 2, offering only 3.8 flash is such a bad decision” [source](https://twitter.com/1292582087426322432/status/2111839388871348707)
- Google Antigravity, 2026-10-16, r/google_antigravity (Reddit): “i really wish they didn't remove the 3.1 pro model in antigravity. i don't trust the flash models to do any work needing analytical depth, but i don't like the burn rates of argon.” [source](https://www.reddit.com/r/google_antigravity/comments/1x73yrd/my_thoughts_about_argon_4_in_antigravity_pro_user/ph613iw/)
- Google Antigravity, 2026-10-16, r/google_antigravity (Reddit): “so they removed 3.1 pro which had decent limits just to give us a tiny argon limit ? i would have preferred to keep 3.1 pro...” [source](https://www.reddit.com/r/google_antigravity/comments/1x73yrd/my_thoughts_about_argon_4_in_antigravity_pro_user/ph2a6ym/)

### 7. Astra model availability

- OpenAI Codex, 2026-10-04, r/codex (Reddit): “who the fuck cares about sol ultrafast? most users don’t even have access to ultrafast. we want astra 6.1, instead they seen bent on making users burn usage even faster.” [source](https://www.reddit.com/r/codex/comments/1wxk6tj/they_are_completely_out_of_touch_with_what_users/)
- Zed, 2026-09-28, @zeddotdev (X): “@zeddotdev hi, when can i get access to astra and opus 5.5 thanks.” [source](https://twitter.com/1435772434267922438/status/2104627080273293728)
- Kiro, 2026-09-23, @kirodotdev (X): “@kirodotdev please kiro, give us what we want: astra, fable, opus 5.5, sol 6, luna 6 !!! pleaseeee” [source](https://twitter.com/1794045418445115392/status/2102796562518933904)

### 8. Opus 5.5 model support

- Amp, 2026-10-10, @AmpCode (X): “@benvargas @____hnsn @ampcode yeah that's my medium mode right now and add opus 5.5 medium for subagents :)” [source](https://twitter.com/1705384263867379712/status/2108794699133903047)
- Google Antigravity, 2026-10-05, @antigravity (X): “@antigravity why i don't see opus 5.5 and sonet 5.5 ? [link]” [source](https://twitter.com/2807255978/status/2107159747921146304)
- Pi, 2026-10-04, r/PiCodingAgent (Reddit): “mostly codex (sol 6.1 & astra), occasionally kimi/glm/grok. would love to use opus 5.5. :-(” [source](https://www.reddit.com/r/PiCodingAgent/comments/1wxqvk2/what_model_are_you_using_with_pi/pdwgl9b/)

### 9. Release Gemini 4 / Argon models

- Google Antigravity, 2026-10-17, r/google_antigravity (Reddit): “continue the good work. we need a proper flash model to pair with argon next!” [source](https://www.reddit.com/r/google_antigravity/comments/1x7xc0v/wow_argon_is_finally_a_bit_usable_in_pro_now/ph9kq0x/)
- Google Antigravity, 2026-10-16, r/google_antigravity (Reddit): “i think its only good for special cases. lets hope that they release gemini 4 flash and pro sometimes soon so we have good all-rounders, that way argon can be our "6 astra" for super tough tasks.” [source](https://www.reddit.com/r/google_antigravity/comments/1x73yrd/my_thoughts_about_argon_4_in_antigravity_pro_user/ph1888a/)
- Google Antigravity, 2026-10-16, @antigravity (X): “@rodydavis we urgently want gemini 4 flash @geminiapp @google @antigravity @officiallogank” [source](https://twitter.com/2086871787862708224/status/2110992281771630998)

### 10. Faster addition of newly released models

- Claude Code, 2026-10-18, @ClaudeDevs (X): “@claudedevs so glad to be paying $200/month while not getting access to these features when they drop.” [source](https://twitter.com/251112553/status/2111901472447467607)
- Claude Code, 2026-10-18, @ClaudeDevs (X): “@claudedevs i want fable 5.5 engineering perfect work with unreal (plugin) 1:1 image to blender native music surround r&d” [source](https://twitter.com/1982946649602428928/status/2111901439706689801)
- Factory, 2026-10-17, @droid (X): “i hope we will see this at @deepinfra and @droid soon. [link]” [source](https://twitter.com/1590702228234391552/status/2111384058018283661)

### 11. Gated features on lower plans

- Claude Code, 2026-10-16, @ClaudeDevs (X): “@claudedevs 3x faster plus quick/standard/deep per repo is a nice touch. any timeline for max plans? lots of solo devs on max 20x open prs all day too.” [source](https://twitter.com/78404464/status/2111082830306672798)
- Claude Code, 2026-10-16, @ClaudeDevs (X): “@claudedevs any thoughts about rolling this our to individual plans ?” [source](https://twitter.com/2002359921611030528/status/2111004949068808445)
- Claude Code, 2026-10-16, @ClaudeDevs (X): “@claudedevs good to see this out of beta. hope it comes to more plans soon.” [source](https://twitter.com/1749693887122210816/status/2110994718712791366)

### 12. GPT-6 Sol and Luna model support

- Cursor, 2026-10-10, r/cursor (Reddit): “well, there is... because cursor doesn't have access to gpt6.1. which is significantly cheaper than 5.6.” [source](https://www.reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1x1uyq6/i_did_cancel_my_subscription_and_tried_chatgpt/pf0xpy4/)
- OpenAI Codex, 2026-10-08, r/OpenAI (Reddit): “i thought chat was unlimited (except for pro) and codex had usage. they can merge but 5.6 should be free in codes like it is in chat.” [source](https://www.reddit.com/r/OpenAI/comments/1wy2h4d/are_you_planning_to_cancel_your_chatgpt_plus/pemh33c/)
- Google Antigravity, 2026-10-06, @antigravity (X): “@adhidesign @googledeepmind @antigravity change the font to google sans flex, also for ai studio, please. and if possible, we need gpt 6 🙏🙏” [source](https://twitter.com/1694170572274716672/status/2107601125168030163)

## Every agent

| Agent | Overall rank | Reading | Customer love | 95% interval | n | Praise | Complaint |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [OpenCode](https://feedbackbench.com/coding-agents/agents/opencode.md) | 3 | 1st of 11 | 0.645 | 0.612–0.676 | 463 | 186 | 277 |
| [Devin](https://feedbackbench.com/coding-agents/agents/devin.md) | 2 | 2nd of 11 | 0.600 | 0.568–0.632 | 59 | 44 | 15 |
| [Factory](https://feedbackbench.com/coding-agents/agents/factory.md) | 6 | 3rd of 11 | 0.589 | 0.556–0.619 | 46 | 33 | 13 |
| [GitHub Copilot](https://feedbackbench.com/coding-agents/agents/copilot.md) | 9 | 4th of 11 | 0.578 | 0.546–0.610 | 90 | 46 | 44 |
| [Claude Code](https://feedbackbench.com/coding-agents/agents/claude-code.md) | 1 | 5th of 11 | 0.558 | 0.523–0.592 | 195 | 59 | 136 |
| [Cursor](https://feedbackbench.com/coding-agents/agents/cursor.md) | 7 | 6th of 11 | 0.555 | 0.521–0.589 | 394 | 130 | 264 |
| [Amp](https://feedbackbench.com/coding-agents/agents/amp.md) | 5 | 7th of 11 | 0.551 | 0.524–0.578 | 37 | 21 | 16 |
| [Pi](https://feedbackbench.com/coding-agents/agents/pi.md) | 4 | 8th of 11 | 0.541 | 0.518–0.566 | 40 | 22 | 18 |
| [Kiro](https://feedbackbench.com/coding-agents/agents/kiro.md) | 13 | 9th of 11 | 0.478 | 0.460–0.497 | 56 | 7 | 49 |
| [OpenAI Codex](https://feedbackbench.com/coding-agents/agents/codex.md) | 10 | 10th of 11 | 0.408 | 0.376–0.441 | 787 | 130 | 657 |
| [Google Antigravity](https://feedbackbench.com/coding-agents/agents/antigravity.md) | 14 | 11th of 11 | 0.241 | 0.219–0.268 | 790 | 71 | 719 |
| [Cline](https://feedbackbench.com/coding-agents/agents/cline.md) | 11 | Too few posts | – | – | 24 | 8 | 16 |
| [Conductor](https://feedbackbench.com/coding-agents/agents/conductor.md) | 12 | Too few posts | – | – | 17 | 7 | 10 |
| [Zed](https://feedbackbench.com/coding-agents/agents/zed.md) | 8 | Too few posts | – | – | 13 | 3 | 10 |
| [Warp](https://feedbackbench.com/coding-agents/agents/warp.md) | 15 | Too few posts | – | – | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| [Grok Build](https://feedbackbench.com/coding-agents/agents/grok-build.md) | 16 | Too few posts | – | – | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| [Augment Code](https://feedbackbench.com/coding-agents/agents/augment.md) | 17 | Too few posts | – | – | 0 | 0 | 0 |

## Posts

Receipts rule: Up to 5 praise and 5 complaint posts per area and 3 per criterion. Each is a whole post of 60 to 450 characters (700 for areas) with at least 8 words beyond handles and links, that judges the criterion, whose labels are all praise or all complaint, and that contains no slur. Posts that touch the fewest criteria come first, then posts of at most 280 characters, then the newest. A second large language model reads the first 3 candidates per slot and keeps a post only if it clearly praises, or clearly complains about, the agent on that criterion. Links and personal details removed by the source show as marks such as [link].

### OpenCode

- Praise, 2026-10-15, r/opencode (Reddit): “they are very fast with bringing new models! i have used so many stealth models on opencode, that otherwise i wouldn't even know about” [source](https://www.reddit.com/r/opencode/comments/1x6ivix/round_of_applause_to_opencode/pgwifok/)
- Complaint, 2026-10-16, @opencode (X): “@opencode i have both go and zen creds. it still says go subscription needed, log shows 403 . i think this has become like nvidia nim models” [source](https://twitter.com/1077063246513721344/status/2111140545183805447)
- Complaint, 2026-10-13, r/opencode (Reddit): “i just signed up to the opencode paid plan. unfortunately my model changed with that and now i am messing around with models that don't really work for me. i liked big pickle. can i get it back or is the hidden model behind it known?” [source](https://www.reddit.com/r/opencode/comments/1x4i7go/what_model_is_big_pickle_today/)

### Devin

- Praise, 2026-10-18, @cognition (X): “@altagers @cognition i switched to devin and droid because i have every model in one sub and both harnesses are really great” [source](https://twitter.com/1466416677713854477/status/2111810899011059755)
- Praise, 2026-10-13, @cognition (X): “@chris_wozniczek @devinai @cognition i'm very happy that devin allows me to use gemini 4 argon!” [source](https://twitter.com/1067085110372171779/status/2110109819827060818)
- Praise, 2026-10-13, @DevinAI (X): “@nando_g_ai @devinai i think right now it's the best for having all models in one.” [source](https://twitter.com/2034540258365489152/status/2110079410791485450)
- Complaint, 2026-09-29, @cognition (X): “@cognition weird gpt-6.1 doesn't have the use with chatgpt plan toggle” [source](https://twitter.com/34314592/status/2105008282058584444)
- Complaint, 2026-09-23, @cognition (X): “@cognition why don’t i have access to the new opus and gpt models in devin cloud?” [source](https://twitter.com/39675957/status/2102559134272868403)
- Complaint, 2026-09-12, @cognition (X): “i'm tried @cognition on free plan. swe-1.6 slow model is the only model available, but it's not slow at all!. i wish i have access to latest model as well.” [source](https://twitter.com/1534111445985636352/status/2098665173670334911)

### Factory

- Praise, 2026-10-13, @FactoryAI (X): “@chris_petkas @factoryai @matansf they got mistral in plenty early and that's been the biggest ai thing for me in a hot minute. finding issues to fix is the hard part.” [source](https://twitter.com/1923709631265959936/status/2110012163536630108)
- Praise, 2026-10-12, @FactoryAI (X): “@simonasltu1 since 6 sol, i have realised that you have to pick a harness that offers all inference providers, not just one. i switch to @factoryai on the 20th. 6 and 6.1 have made a mess.” [source](https://twitter.com/2092917005506449408/status/2109547077709758834)
- Praise, 2026-10-07, @droid (X): “@htmleverything @droid @_qudo they are 100% next level. the biggest selling point for me on droid was being able to combo just about any major model (try it on $20 plan) @_qudo went full codex maxi for now tho [link]” [source](https://twitter.com/1515036735826186248/status/2107940333556293816)
- Complaint, 2026-09-26, @FactoryAI (X): “hey @factoryai, i think custom models are broken in the app right now. i’m unable to see or select any of my custom models from the model picker. they just don’t show up at all, so i can’t use them. not sure if this is a recent regression, but would appreciate a fix. @ross_cefalu” [source](https://twitter.com/1625280993966923777/status/2103738831778529329)
- Complaint, 2026-09-22, @FactoryAI (X): “@tereza_tizkova @factoryai @droid i have been trying to ask you about deepseek 4.1 flash being offered for weeks” [source](https://twitter.com/1258455699073441793/status/2102454686070571282)
- Complaint, 2026-09-10, @droid (X): “@iamshivii @droid just checked the web version, and yeah, astra is there now. still nothing in the cli though, which is kinda weird.” [source](https://twitter.com/1260921/status/2097939105883505019)

### GitHub Copilot

- Praise, 2026-10-13, r/cursor (Reddit): “github copilot lets you pick between them, it’s gotten decent compared to what it used to be. i don’t know about pricing though i have it for work.” [source](https://www.reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1x4kpoo/no_more_3rd_party_model_usage_via_x_subsciption/pgf3kqs/)
- Praise, 2026-10-09, r/singularity (Reddit): “no idea what you’re talking about. astra 6 and fable 5.1 are available. if your firm has put some guardrails on them that’s not a copilot problem it’s an implementation problem.” [source](https://www.reddit.com/r/singularity/comments/1x1z0um/introducing_microsoftdecision1_our_model_for_fast/pey9zjj/)
- Praise, 2026-10-05, @GitHubCopilot (X): “@stolinski @pvncher this is where @githubcopilot excels. photo of the mobile app with a partial list of models to select from. [link]” [source](https://twitter.com/14566379/status/2107233675075080260)
- Complaint, 2026-10-14, r/GithubCopilot (Reddit): “no point; just go straight to 3.8 flash; copilot is sunsetting 3.7 in like a week. edit: it’s even dumber than that: as if a week ago, google is routing requests that target 3.7 to use 3.8 instead; 3.7 is gone.” [source](https://www.reddit.com/r/GithubCopilot/comments/1x56rzd/gemini_4_argon_in_github_copilot/pgm2v9s/)
- Complaint, 2026-10-14, @GitHubCopilot (X): “@githubcopilot you guys have a bug where max members can't access models reserved for pro+ and above. please fix. [link]” [source](https://twitter.com/1518711697493663745/status/2110164915801792738)
- Complaint, 2026-10-14, @GitHubCopilot (X): “@githubcopilot you guys have a bug where max members can't access models reserved for pro+ and above. please fix. error id: [id] [link]” [source](https://twitter.com/1518711697493663745/status/2110165671091085590)

### Claude Code

- Complaint, 2026-10-12, @ClaudeDevs (X): “@claudedevs @claudeai please remove the stale models from the list. this is clutter and annoying. no one is using opus 4.8, opus 5, sonnet 5, haiku 4.5...etc. [link]” [source](https://twitter.com/2107514894601908226/status/2109656345179992155)
- Complaint, 2026-10-11, r/ClaudeCode (Reddit): “you cant use them in claude code but you can use them in pi agent/opencode by putting in the api key” [source](https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeCode/comments/1x31yts/claude_max_20x_now_get_200_in_free_api_credits/pf7qfjt/)
- Complaint, 2026-10-09, @ClaudeDevs (X): “@claudedevs guys please update the claude chrome plugin, its still using opus5, latest models are missing” [source](https://twitter.com/57762362/status/2108566219510939746)

### Cursor

- Praise, 2026-10-14, r/ClaudeCode (Reddit): “when building our mac app, a second model helps most when the first is stuck on a specific bug, not as a standing multi-agent team. cursor’s model picker gets much of that benefit without paying three times to maintain three versions of the same context.” [source](https://www.reddit.com/r/ClaudeCode/comments/1x4vdye/multiagent_orchestration_with_claude_pro_google/pgo8yc8/)
- Praise, 2026-10-13, r/cursor (Reddit): “not sure, as i use it from my company, but they have a ton of models to choose from.” [source](https://www.reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1x4kpoo/no_more_3rd_party_model_usage_via_x_subsciption/pgfiljy/)
- Complaint, 2026-10-18, @cursor_ai (X): “grok 4.7 is very buggy for a frontier model! and with the new subscription model, @cursor_ai has no alternatives now... so sad. i understand that part of the team has had huge product success with @bot, but it's really disappointing that cursor itself is struggling.” [source](https://twitter.com/967976754890657792/status/2111888769683169769)
- Complaint, 2026-10-16, r/cursor (Reddit): “yeah but it's pretty useless as all the large models force you to use max mode. so you can normally only use models like haiku, luna, etc” [source](https://www.reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1x7dos2/final_thoughts_on_cursor/ph6zr5l/)
- Complaint, 2026-10-16, @cursor_ai (X): “@cursor_ai @spacexai i have been on the legacy plan, which is more perfect for me. i upgraded my plan and i realized that i could only access composer and grok models, which isn't suits my work at all.” [source](https://twitter.com/1163109596610928641/status/2111080897373946337)

### Amp

- Praise, 2026-10-12, @AmpCode (X): “i love that @ampcode now supports claude! one request, @thorstenball and @sqs is there any chance that project-based connections is a thing coming soon? (work vs play ai subs based on project settings).” [source](https://twitter.com/1405835361021042691/status/2109653765561504200)
- Praise, 2026-10-01, @AmpCode (X): “the main reason i use chatgpt over claude is because i can use it in @ampcode tbh” [source](https://twitter.com/317888049/status/2105716547889271091)
- Praise, 2026-09-29, @AmpCode (X): “same! wouldn’t be using opus if it weren’t for @ampcode [link]” [source](https://twitter.com/33135576/status/2104798639956902098)
- Complaint, 2026-10-01, @AmpCode (X): “@raor_00 @fprzdev @ampcode currently, they have chatgpt and grok. in my case, i connected grok and it is using that. i would like it to have a connection with claude, but it is still not possible even close.” [source](https://twitter.com/42812549/status/2105692804550660481)
- Complaint, 2026-09-26, @AmpCode (X): “@wendell_adriel i'm in the exact same boat. i haven't used sol at all in the last week after using opus 5.5 for a few tasks. i'm primarily using @ampcode, and i find myself dealing with the experimental external agent feature just for opus.” [source](https://twitter.com/10604/status/2103904355766407327)
- Complaint, 2026-09-23, @AmpCode (X): “we need a strong response with astra 6.1. still playing with opus 5.5. hammering all night didn't move any usage much. not super impressed but it's moving much smarter than gpt 6 sol. biggest pain point is not driving via @ampcode for opus 5.5. [link]” [source](https://twitter.com/51510563/status/2102771724643168704)

### Pi

- Praise, 2026-10-06, @pidotdev (X): “@omarsar0 @pidotdev this is exactly the kinda stuff i like experimenting with. and being able to swap models without rebuilding the whole agent is a huge plus too” [source](https://twitter.com/1702925031360143360/status/2107474167406956757)
- Praise, 2026-10-02, r/PiCodingAgent (Reddit): “on the contrary, i can switch models from gpt, claude, glm as they release new version without having to change my harness. much more confortable than having to change harness to use a different model.” [source](https://www.reddit.com/r/PiCodingAgent/comments/1wvqksf/pi_folks_how_are_you_not_exhausted/pde3dwa/)
- Praise, 2026-09-20, @pidotdev (X): “@pidotdev when i realized you could just have models invoke other models from other labs in the cli. was an early one but a game changer for me” [source](https://twitter.com/2069281373932650496/status/2101780014639251795)
- Complaint, 2026-10-12, @pidotdev (X): “hey @pidotdev folks, pis default model list for meta doesnt have the new models yet, and also doesn't support max thinking. my extension does both! [link] [link]” [source](https://twitter.com/35048764/status/2109712423741763723)
- Complaint, 2026-10-08, @pidotdev (X): “@opencode @pidotdev why its not automatically fetching the list of models in opencode and opencode-go? i have to wait for next release. same goes for github-copilot sub in pi.” [source](https://twitter.com/1843636086485966848/status/2108209734641942838)
- Complaint, 2026-09-22, @pidotdev (X): “@pidotdev can we actually run it ? i am dying to run opus in pi since forever. i got codex sub just so i can their models in pi.” [source](https://twitter.com/2685094046/status/2102458590493806948)

### Kiro

- Praise, 2026-09-27, @kirodotdev (X): “@kirodotdev finally, we have opus 5.5 in kiro!!! 🎉 thanks for finally adding it! hope to see the gpt-6 lineup in kiro soon too. [link]” [source](https://twitter.com/1673330175939956739/status/2104121435983958182)
- Praise, 2026-09-26, @kirodotdev (X): “@hanjack375478 @kirodotdev it's available check your drop-down menu they haven't updated the models changelog on site but you can see opus 5.5 with 2x multiplier great work 👍” [source](https://twitter.com/2075998391793037312/status/2103842954746208739)
- Praise, 2026-09-05, r/google_antigravity (Reddit): “define “most capable models” outside of fable which extremely overrated, all the frontier models are available on kiro” [source](https://www.reddit.com/r/google_antigravity/comments/1w786df/is_kiro_better_for_development/p7vz1ak/)
- Complaint, 2026-09-26, r/kiroIDE (Reddit): “no mate i've been checking everyday in my kiro ide and it's not there yet. only opus 5” [source](https://www.reddit.com/r/kiroIDE/comments/1wpveza/kiro_and_opus_55/pc44hzp/)
- Complaint, 2026-09-26, r/kiroIDE (Reddit): “i'm on enterprise subscription and fable is not in the list [link]” [source](https://www.reddit.com/r/kiroIDE/comments/1wpveza/kiro_and_opus_55/pc5k9ad/)
- Complaint, 2026-09-26, @kirodotdev (X): “@arthuryuzbashev @kirodotdev yeah kiro is a bit of a slow learner 😂 models take time to be available there” [source](https://twitter.com/1139838247570477058/status/2103798903900442975)

### OpenAI Codex

- Praise, 2026-10-11, r/codex (Reddit): “codex is smarter but solely because there you can choose smarter models like 6.1 sol and 6 astra” [source](https://www.reddit.com/r/codex/comments/1x3fi2z/is_chatgpt_chat_truly_as_smart_as_codex/pfaydmn/)
- Complaint, 2026-10-16, r/codex (Reddit): “i have daybreak blue but you can't use astra or 6.1 sol with it.” [source](https://www.reddit.com/r/codex/comments/1x77sd4/does_anyone_has_access_to_daybreak/ph4lxz6/)
- Complaint, 2026-10-16, X search: OpenAI Codex, Codex CLI, Codex app (X): “since when pro users cant use gpt-image-2.5-flare on codex / chatgpt?? i have tried it on codex cli, codex cloud, chatgpt, nothing... is it api only?? but docs says its included.. @thsottiaux @openai [link]” [source](https://twitter.com/720673086291460097/status/2111211203712221649)
- Complaint, 2026-10-15, X search: OpenAI Codex, Codex CLI, Codex app (X): “@thsottiaux i have pro 500 and don't have access to ultrafast on codex app/cli, but work mode in chatgpt work on web. please look into fixing.” [source](https://twitter.com/1434493002/status/2110762195202068948)

### Google Antigravity

- Praise, 2026-10-17, r/google_antigravity (Reddit): “i was on the free trial for a year. 2 days ago, i paid google for the first time, the 6 dollars discounted price, and i instantly got argon and opus/sonnet 5.5 after the transaction was processed.” [source](https://www.reddit.com/r/google_antigravity/comments/1x7qnlw/were_cooked/ph9vye0/)
- Praise, 2026-10-16, r/google_antigravity (Reddit): “i checked antigravity and we even have in second class canada! thanks! (canada used to get new google ai products after everyone else).” [source](https://www.reddit.com/r/google_antigravity/comments/1x708ez/gemini_4_argon_now_available_on_paid_google_ai_pro/ph0bwhn/)
- Praise, 2026-10-16, r/google_antigravity (Reddit): “gemini 4 argon just released to pro in agv, but thanks for your opinion. finally more people can enjoy argon including me!” [source](https://www.reddit.com/r/google_antigravity/comments/1x5n5e3/dont_worry_gemini_4_argon_will_roll_out_to_agy/ph2qubi/)
- Complaint, 2026-10-18, r/google_antigravity (Reddit): “for me, my personal experience with antigravity is an an ultimate low. i am still locked out of argon everywhere (antigravity desktop and cli) except for gemini with my paid pro account.” [source](https://www.reddit.com/r/google_antigravity/comments/1x8unih/watching_google_ais_reputation_bounce_back_and/phgfjtr/)
- Complaint, 2026-10-18, r/google_antigravity (Reddit): “claude models? paid pro, argon? paid pro, student benefit pro for 1 year? nope” [source](https://www.reddit.com/r/google_antigravity/comments/1x8unih/watching_google_ais_reputation_bounce_back_and/phijzvw/)
- Complaint, 2026-10-18, r/google_antigravity (Reddit): “when you have literally every model available to you - of course argon would not be so impressive. meanwhile, people were stuck with half baked 3.1 pro preview and flash models. some, including me, still sadly do.” [source](https://www.reddit.com/r/google_antigravity/comments/1x8x6nn/dont_worry_too_much_argon_its_genuinely_not_that/phiufdb/)

### Cline

- Praise, 2026-09-15, @cline (X): “@datachaz @cline switching models mid-project is the detail that sells this for me. as a solo dev i'm constantly bouncing between providers, and having that in a native app instead of juggling tabs is a real workflow win.” [source](https://twitter.com/1574441173149970432/status/2099747757573517819)
- Praise, 2026-09-14, @cline (X): “@cline i love this! the number of models it has is insane. i don’t even need to switch harness” [source](https://twitter.com/1857824397685567492/status/2099540268731289695)
- Praise, 2026-09-14, @cline (X): “@ravikiran_dev7 @cline it has many open weight models. i am loving it” [source](https://twitter.com/1857824397685567492/status/2099540607186395341)
- Complaint, 2026-10-08, @cline (X): “@cline hey bro!could you please consider adding claude models for cline pass users? even just haiku 5.5 would be great, especially since competing tools like opencode and command go already support it. without it, i'm seriously thinking about dropping my cline pass subscription.” [source](https://twitter.com/1725701176757559296/status/2108022720827121857)
- Complaint, 2026-10-03, @cline (X): “@cline i updated the desktop app to the latest version and still don't see the model” [source](https://twitter.com/1865533776446517248/status/2106485428803236241)
- Complaint, 2026-09-11, @cline (X): “@sucrasm @cline clinepass glm 5.3 flash and deepseek v4.1 flash are both missing. i don't know what they are thinking. opencode go and command have both been added.” [source](https://twitter.com/2083910218639872000/status/2098335610230513788)

### Conductor

- Praise, 2026-09-20, @conductor_build (X): “@blueemi99 @claudeai i can already use by @claudeai in @conductor_build and @t3dotcodes 🥸” [source](https://twitter.com/2275729969/status/2101712865300541647)
- Praise, 2026-09-20, @conductor_build (X): “@mparakhin have you tried @conductor_build? doesn’t lock you into a model” [source](https://twitter.com/154998786/status/2101723586750779659)
- Praise, 2026-10-08, @conductor_build (X): “@ryancarson built my code factory using @conductor_build remote and task system based on beads. using runs-on for ci. can use what ever model i want and pay no makeup prices on tokens.” [source](https://twitter.com/1147023900552773633/status/2108304197368340966)
- Complaint, 2026-09-30, @conductor_build (X): “hey @conductor_build team, you show codex sol 6.1 in the model list, but when i prompt it, i get this error: "the ‘gpt-6.1-sol’ model is not supported when using codex with a chatgpt account." i can use it on terminal via cli but not on conductor. fyi” [source](https://twitter.com/75535021/status/2105308753965064233)
- Complaint, 2026-09-04, @conductor_build (X): “@conductor_build i already have gpt 6 astra in my account! but i still can't use it in conductor!! upgrade please!!!” [source](https://twitter.com/1185832316528218113/status/2095954503002411044)

### Zed

- Complaint, 2026-09-29, @zeddotdev (X): “@zeddotdev in the new version of delta, there’s a bug: my chatgpt subscription is no longer available as a provider.” [source](https://twitter.com/2035030715189141509/status/2104996620307718609)
- Complaint, 2026-09-23, @zeddotdev (X): “@zeddotdev yo i'm using my grok sub with delta and it only gives grok 4.6/4.5 as options for models. please support grok 4.7 and composer 2.5. this should be an auto refresh thing imo.” [source](https://twitter.com/1836929256569425921/status/2102785465682460969)
- Complaint, 2026-08-31, @zeddotdev (X): “@zeddotdev @zeddotdev hi. i have a question: i paid for an opencode go subscription, but not all available models are showing up in the zed editor. i found a closed pull request on github regarding this issue. do you plan to fix this? otherwise, my subscription is pointless.” [source](https://twitter.com/1498680807405330433/status/2094314242044293271)