# Google Antigravity (Google)

Feedback Bench, coding agents, built 2026-10-19, window 2026-08-31 to 2026-10-18. Web page: https://feedbackbench.com/coding-agents/#/agent/antigravity

| Measure | Value |
|---|---|
| Rank | 14 of 17 (rank range 13–15) |
| Feedback Score | 41.3 (95% interval 40.0–42.7) |
| Popularity | 0.807 (share of voice 8.69%) |
| Customer love | 0.394 (95% interval 0.382–0.405) |
| Place | Popularity 4th of 17 × Customer love 17th of 17 |
| Top quadrant | no |
| Users | 12223 |
| Posts counted | 30817 |
| Posts that judge the agent | 10752 |
| Criteria ranking high / low | 2 / 30 of 63 |

## The brief

Written by large language models from this page's numbers and the posts it quotes, then checked: every number in the text is in the build. Interpretation, not measurement.

Google Antigravity is one of the most discussed coding agents and the least liked. Users praise early quota resets and say the models have improved. They leave over work that falls short, quotas that run out fast, and new models they cannot get on paid plans. It ranks 4th of 17 for popularity and last for customer love. In posts that compare it with another agent, users more often prefer the other one: OpenAI Codex leads 139 to 93, and Claude Code leads 96 to 35.

### Why people choose it

- **Early quota resets refill usage** ([Fair quota resets](https://feedbackbench.com/coding-agents/criteria/limits.reset_schedule.md)). 2nd: of 5 on “Fair quota resets”. 2% of what users rate. Users describe Google resetting weekly and five-hour quotas early and without notice, sometimes twice in a month. People who were close to running out say they got their full allowance back.
  Evidence:
  - 2026-10-17, @antigravity (X): “@antigravity @geminiapp google randomly reset my antigravity quotas today. on ultra and basically out now back at full. didn’t expect that. pretty cool.” [source](https://twitter.com/1728999478361726976/status/2111247823312142645)
  - 2026-10-14, r/GoogleAntigravityIDE (Reddit): “if it works with luna, yes. and plus, they give you a quota reset; i have had 2 so far this month, and they apply the resets whenever they want.” [source](https://www.reddit.com/r/GoogleAntigravityIDE/comments/1x5r1cb/only_1_model_vs_7_model_codex/pgr3shp/)
- **Many users say the models have improved** ([Quality doesn't slip over time](https://feedbackbench.com/coding-agents/criteria/models.quality_drift.md)). 2.3×: 7% of what users rate, 2.3× the rate for other agents. Ranks 3rd of 7 on “Quality doesn't slip over time”. Many posts say the models got better over recent weeks. Some rank 3.8 Flash above the older Pro model. Others say quality dropped, so users on both sides discuss the topic often.
  Evidence:
  - 2026-10-07, @antigravity (X): “@antigravity has been beefed up. the 3.8 flash has become way better than it was last week. i sense they are up to something. and it's good.” [source](https://twitter.com/1491091729214500865/status/2107910332903801289)
  - 2026-10-13, r/google_antigravity (Reddit): “first i was mad on google, now i'm happy. flash 3.8 is better than pro 3.1 [[link]” [source](https://www.reddit.com/r/google_antigravity/comments/1x4l3aq/gemini_31_pro_was_just_officially_removed_from/pgfw8dq/)

### Why people leave

- **Work falls short on real codebases** ([Quality of work](https://feedbackbench.com/coding-agents/criteria/work.md)). 14th: of 14 on “Quality of work”. 35% of what users rate. Users describe models that lose their way in large or complex codebases and add errors, so they use another agent to correct the output. Permission prompts are a second complaint. Users say the CLI asks them to approve basic commands one by one, so they have to watch it.
  Evidence:
  - 2026-10-18, r/google_antigravity (Reddit): “you are crazy! 3.8 messing up a lot here. i have him implement and gpt to correct. there hasn't been a single time when he managed to implement anything without coming back with an error.” [source](https://www.reddit.com/r/google_antigravity/comments/1x97wfi/argon_best_model_ive_used_but_not_useful_for_pro/phjcc8u/)
  - 2026-10-18, @antigravity (X): “@antigravity , i use antigravity cli sometimes. i wont say i am a power user of agy. but i am really frustrated by the approval system. literally i had to babysit for tow hours and accepts nearly hundred commands. most of them are basic git and playwrite commands. [link]” [source](https://twitter.com/2039376148438622208/status/2111827089389396199)
- **Quota runs out after a few prompts** ([Pricing and limits](https://feedbackbench.com/coding-agents/criteria/paying.md)). 12th: of 13 on “Pricing and limits”. 31% of what users rate. Posts describe single prompts using up large shares of a weekly allowance, even at low effort. Some users say Google's plans buy less usage than cheaper plans from competitors.
  Evidence:
  - 2026-10-17, r/google_antigravity (Reddit): “one simple prompt, for a very simple task, consumed 90% of the weekly tokens. and that was using low effort.” [source](https://www.reddit.com/r/google_antigravity/comments/1x7qnlw/were_cooked/ph7oc68/)
  - 2026-10-18, r/google_antigravity (Reddit): “tried $100 plan. it has worse usage limits than $20 plans offered by competitors” [source](https://www.reddit.com/r/google_antigravity/comments/1x91yy3/is_argon_good/phhhfh9/)
- **Paying users are locked out of new models** ([Models](https://feedbackbench.com/coding-agents/criteria/models.md)). 2.0×: 20% of what users rate, 2.0× the rate for other agents. Ranks 12th of 12 on “Models”. Users on Pro, student and carrier-promotion plans say they cannot use Gemini 4 Argon in Antigravity, even though it works for them in the Gemini app. Others say older models got worse before Google withdrew them.
  Evidence:
  - 2026-10-18, r/google_antigravity (Reddit): “for me, my personal experience with antigravity is an an ultimate low. i am still locked out of argon everywhere (antigravity desktop and cli) except for gemini with my paid pro account.” [source](https://www.reddit.com/r/google_antigravity/comments/1x8unih/watching_google_ais_reputation_bounce_back_and/phgfjtr/)
  - 2026-10-18, @antigravity (X): “@antigravity i have an pro subscription, why i can not access gemini 4” [source](https://twitter.com/2028714958087933953/status/2111730390012707203)

### Head to head

- **Google Antigravity vs OpenAI Codex**: Google Antigravity ahead in 93 of 232 posts that pick a side, 70 even. Of 302 posts that judge both, Codex comes out ahead in 139 and Antigravity in 93. Users say Codex's models finish work that 3.8 Flash only mocks, and some say Antigravity is faster. In Codex's own subreddit the result flips: Antigravity leads 36 to 11.
  - 2026-10-13, r/google_antigravity (Reddit): “i have both antigravity 20$ and codex 20$ i can say that sol 6.1 is times better, it could reimplement lotsssssss of stuff and 3.8 flash only mocks., not max obviously, but the thing is please don't before 4 argon is tested” [source](https://www.reddit.com/r/google_antigravity/comments/1x520pn/antigravity_vs_codex_vs_claude_maxultra_comparison/pgijxqm/)
  - 2026-10-05, r/GoogleAntigravityIDE (Reddit): “i am not a professional coder; i do more marketing work. i feel that anti-gravity is faster, so let's use it in conjunction with codex.” [source](https://www.reddit.com/r/GoogleAntigravityIDE/comments/1wwpk15/im_not_interested_in_claude_im_just_waiting_for/pdzg3ll/)
- **Google Antigravity vs Claude Code**: Google Antigravity ahead in 35 of 131 posts that pick a side, 31 even. Of 162 posts that judge both, Claude Code comes out ahead in 96 and Antigravity in 35. Users say Claude Code gets things right more often. Users who prefer Antigravity say a subscription buys more work.
  - 2026-10-13, r/google_antigravity (Reddit): “sadly i have to agree. claude code gets stuff right more often, and fixes bugs more thoroughly. ultimately at this point it's a better use of time and money.” [source](https://www.reddit.com/r/google_antigravity/comments/1x51bhz/just_get_claude_code_btw/pgigmoi/)
  - 2026-10-05, r/google_antigravity (Reddit): “it feels to me like the amount of work that you can do with antigravity/ flash is higher than the work you can do with a claude subscription with claude code. but it's really hard to directly compare them.” [source](https://www.reddit.com/r/google_antigravity/comments/1wy9j83/200month_ultra_five_minutes_of_claude_used_58_of/pe1syqg/)
- **Google Antigravity vs Cursor**: Google Antigravity ahead in 18 of 46 posts that pick a side, 21 even. Of 67 posts that judge both, Cursor comes out ahead in 28 and Antigravity in 18. Users who prefer Cursor say Antigravity's tooling cannot compete. Users who prefer Antigravity point to lower prices. In Cursor's subreddit Antigravity leads 8 to 6.
  - 2026-10-17, @antigravity (X): “so thanks the @googleai gemini 4 argon limits are ok now, but i feel like @antigravity needs an update, compared to @droid , @cursor_ai or @cognition devin it just cant compete.” [source](https://twitter.com/2028221376092581888/status/2111400376003936274)
  - 2026-10-14, r/cursor (Reddit): “gemini antigravity is looking really good, i have as a backup for cursor, and it has been working a lot better than cursor, and google pricing in my country is more affordable and has family plan” [source](https://www.reddit.com/r/cursor/comments/1x57zof/comment/pgmvlb9/)
- **Google Antigravity vs OpenCode**: Google Antigravity ahead in 13 of 43 posts that pick a side, 16 even. Of 59 posts that judge both, OpenCode comes out ahead in 30 and Antigravity in 13. Users say OpenCode's free models and its harness beat what a paid Antigravity plan gives them.
  - 2026-10-06, r/google_antigravity (Reddit): “at this point i dont even use antigravity anywmore. free models on opencode (musespark1.3, spacebunny) are better than their best model (flash 3.8). its like i am only paying google ai pro for thr 5tb storage and a hope that they release a better model.” [source](https://www.reddit.com/r/google_antigravity/comments/1wygnf4/google_ai_pro_plan_decreased_antigravity_tokens/pe4vepg/)
  - 2026-10-14, r/google_antigravity (Reddit): “but...my bet....in 10 or 20 days they will figure it out the cache and how to bring it to everybody. also, they need to improve the harness. i use opencode for free and every model is better. agy needs lots of love.” [source](https://www.reddit.com/r/google_antigravity/comments/1x5orit/why_didnt_google_give_argon_in_agy_instead_of/pgoicoc/)

### What would move its score

Rule: For each area where an agent's customer love is below the category norm: the Feedback Score and rank it would have if that one area were at the norm (0.5) and everything else stayed the same, computed with the same formula as the ranking. An area's pull follows its weight, so an area many users of the category rate moves the score more than one they rarely mention.

| Area at the category norm | Feedback Score | Change | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| Doing the work | 44.9 | +3.6 | 12th of 17 |
| Paying and limits | 43.6 | +2.4 | 12th of 17 |
| Choosing models | 42.9 | +1.6 | 13th of 17 |
| Setting up and connecting | 42.0 | +0.7 | 13th of 17 |
| Instructing and context | 41.9 | +0.6 | 13th of 17 |
| Interface and sessions | 41.9 | +0.6 | 13th of 17 |
| Checking and finishing | 41.5 | +0.2 | 14th of 17 |
| Account and support | 41.5 | +0.2 | 14th of 17 |
| Reliability and speed | 41.4 | +0.1 | 14th of 17 |

Quality of work would move the score most. Bringing it to the category norm lifts the Feedback Score from 41.3 to 44.9 and the rank to 12th. Pricing and limits comes next, at 43.6, also 12th. Models would add 1.6 points. Every other area adds less than one point, and no single area lifts the agent above 12th.

### Six weeks

Weekly users went from 2,374 to 3,798 in the last week, and share of voice went from 7% to 14%. Over the same weeks, rank fell from 6th to 15th and love fell from 0.501 to 0.393. Gemini 4 Argon launched on 2026-09-30.

## Top requests

What users ask to add or change, most asked first. 2873 user-weeks ask for something. Requests do not change the Feedback Score. Rule: A separate pass by a large language model reads every counted post and extracts what the user asks the agent or its vendor to add or change, with the criteria it maps to and a short normalised wording; it does not touch the labels or the Feedback Score. A large language model groups the wordings within each criterion (the first criterion the request maps to) into themes, and a second pass merges themes that ask for the same change under different criteria; a merged theme sits under the criterion most of its requests map to, and code counts it once. A theme counts distinct user-weeks that ask for it, per agent; across agents, one user-week per agent. Themes asked in fewer than 2 user-weeks, and requests that share no theme, are not shown. Examples: up to 3 posts per theme from different users, without slurs: whole posts of 60 to 450 characters with at least 8 words beyond handles and links, posts of at most 280 characters first, then the newest.

| Rank | Request | Criterion | User-weeks | Posts |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Newest flagship model on the Pro plan | [Which models are offered on a plan and when](https://feedbackbench.com/coding-agents/criteria/models.catalog_access.md) | 183 | 208 |
| 2 | Release Gemini 4 / Argon models | [Which models are offered on a plan and when](https://feedbackbench.com/coding-agents/criteria/models.catalog_access.md) | 79 | 86 |
| 3 | Update outdated third-party model versions | [Which models are offered on a plan and when](https://feedbackbench.com/coding-agents/criteria/models.catalog_access.md) | 61 | 64 |
| 4 | Subscriptions usable in third-party harnesses | [Using an existing subscription across tools](https://feedbackbench.com/coding-agents/criteria/billing.subscription_portability.md) | 53 | 53 |
| 5 | Higher overall usage limits | [How much use a plan's price buys](https://feedbackbench.com/coding-agents/criteria/limits.plan_value.md) | 52 | 56 |
| 6 | Equal model access for promo and student subscribers | [Which models are offered on a plan and when](https://feedbackbench.com/coding-agents/criteria/models.catalog_access.md) | 44 | 47 |
| 7 | One-time immediate usage reset | [Quota reset timing and bonus or banked resets](https://feedbackbench.com/coding-agents/criteria/limits.reset_schedule.md) | 40 | 41 |
| 8 | Higher limits for specific models | [How much use a plan's price buys](https://feedbackbench.com/coding-agents/criteria/limits.plan_value.md) | 35 | 35 |
| 9 | Keep older models available | [Which models are offered on a plan and when](https://feedbackbench.com/coding-agents/criteria/models.catalog_access.md) | 33 | 34 |
| 10 | Restore removed models | [Which models are offered on a plan and when](https://feedbackbench.com/coding-agents/criteria/models.catalog_access.md) | 32 | 34 |
| 11 | Opus 5.5 model support | [Which models are offered on a plan and when](https://feedbackbench.com/coding-agents/criteria/models.catalog_access.md) | 27 | 29 |
| 12 | Google/Gemini subscription usable in other harnesses | [Using an existing subscription across tools](https://feedbackbench.com/coding-agents/criteria/billing.subscription_portability.md) | 24 | 25 |

### 1. Newest flagship model on the Pro plan

- Google Antigravity, 2026-10-18, @antigravity (X): “@antigravity it seems that i'm the only one in the world still using antigravity ide. why can't argon be used in the ide yet?” [source](https://twitter.com/984631526980816896/status/2111852939526775290)
- Google Antigravity, 2026-10-18, @antigravity (X): “@antigravity what about of antigravity ide, can you add argon here?” [source](https://twitter.com/1945835400213200897/status/2111783502928576877)
- Google Antigravity, 2026-10-17, r/google_antigravity (Reddit): “why don't i have gemini 4 in the pro plan? wtf i only have it in the gemini search. not in gravity cli.” [source](https://www.reddit.com/r/google_antigravity/comments/1x70nez/gemini_4_argon_for_pro_users_has_a_different/phcn8iu/)

### 2. Release Gemini 4 / Argon models

- Google Antigravity, 2026-10-17, r/google_antigravity (Reddit): “continue the good work. we need a proper flash model to pair with argon next!” [source](https://www.reddit.com/r/google_antigravity/comments/1x7xc0v/wow_argon_is_finally_a_bit_usable_in_pro_now/ph9kq0x/)
- Google Antigravity, 2026-10-16, r/google_antigravity (Reddit): “i think its only good for special cases. lets hope that they release gemini 4 flash and pro sometimes soon so we have good all-rounders, that way argon can be our "6 astra" for super tough tasks.” [source](https://www.reddit.com/r/google_antigravity/comments/1x73yrd/my_thoughts_about_argon_4_in_antigravity_pro_user/ph1888a/)
- Google Antigravity, 2026-10-16, @antigravity (X): “@rodydavis we urgently want gemini 4 flash @geminiapp @google @antigravity @officiallogank” [source](https://twitter.com/2086871787862708224/status/2110992281771630998)

### 3. Update outdated third-party model versions

- Google Antigravity, 2026-10-06, @antigravity (X): “@adhidesign @googledeepmind @antigravity newer claude models if its going to take months to drop the next gemini” [source](https://twitter.com/1888643690085691392/status/2107556538944741413)
- Google Antigravity, 2026-10-06, @antigravity (X): “@adhidesign @googledeepmind @antigravity please get rid of gpt oss model and introduce the most recent versions of claude sonnet and opus.” [source](https://twitter.com/2030987812213051392/status/2107556476147610100)
- Google Antigravity, 2026-10-02, r/google_antigravity (Reddit): “they alreay have em: opus 4.6 and sonnet 4.6 are available in antigravity. i think op was referring to adding the frontline models, like sonnet 5.5 or opus 5.5 that ain't gonna happen, tho.” [source](https://www.reddit.com/r/google_antigravity/comments/1wvo76s/claude_sonnet_5_spotted_in_agy/pdf5qvx/)

### 4. Subscriptions usable in third-party harnesses

- Google Antigravity, 2026-10-08, r/google_antigravity (Reddit): “stop this madness google, nobody will use your harness among the other 3000 existing ones. just give us permission to use the tokens via oauth in other harnesses and call it a day. much love” [source](https://www.reddit.com/r/google_antigravity/comments/1x0etjc/antigravity_2_v2211_cli_v1215_v131_releases/pel290z/)
- Google Antigravity, 2026-10-06, @antigravity (X): “@adhidesign @googledeepmind @antigravity allow us to use third party harnesses so we don’t have to use anti gravity.” [source](https://twitter.com/33048677/status/2107483201006694603)
- Google Antigravity, 2026-10-06, @antigravity (X): “@adhidesign @googledeepmind @antigravity let people use the subscription outside of the native harness as well. would instantly make me subscribe.” [source](https://twitter.com/1053130099086618624/status/2107443046862278810)

### 5. Higher overall usage limits

- Google Antigravity, 2026-10-16, r/google_antigravity (Reddit): “forget jio, giving paying users usable limits. 5% per prompt is unacceptable. i had it research and create (2 prompts) working heart pumping fluid simulation and it consumed 59% of my usage !!” [source](https://www.reddit.com/r/google_antigravity/comments/1x59r6k/argon_for_pro_plan_even_for_jio/ph57iq0/)
- Google Antigravity, 2026-10-16, @antigravity (X): “@antigravity out of tokens. you need to figure something out.” [source](https://twitter.com/1364413856/status/2111179292147327422)
- Google Antigravity, 2026-10-16, @antigravity (X): “@antigravity you have further limited plus users. we are still stuck on flash 3.6. now we won't even have access to the pro models. you limited the notebook, you limited antigravity, you limited gemini. i hope you improve the service for plus users.” [source](https://twitter.com/1475166774014492678/status/2111159387481887074)

### 6. Equal model access for promo and student subscribers

- Google Antigravity, 2026-10-18, r/google_antigravity (Reddit): “it is so d*mb.... what's coming next? paid pro plan users can use models, but "gifted" pro users can open agy only and do nothing? stop giving these promotions then...” [source](https://www.reddit.com/r/google_antigravity/comments/1x8y4ap/wth_is_happening_with_gemini_38_flash/phgwxct/)
- Google Antigravity, 2026-10-18, @antigravity (X): “@vipinxtwt jio promised 18 months of google ai pro. fix the antigravity restrictions and give jio pro users access to gemini 4 argon and the benefits they were promised. @jiocare @reliancejio @google @googleindia @vamsibatchuk @sundar @geminiapp @antigravity @googleai” [source](https://twitter.com/1578148914628153344/status/2111739310961762756)
- Google Antigravity, 2026-10-17, r/google_antigravity (Reddit): “why not? like i’m annoyed the student/jio pro plans don’t get argon in agy and stuff… but this is free, just do it.” [source](https://www.reddit.com/r/google_antigravity/comments/1x7o84m/sorry_google_i_will_be_careful_now_and_not_take/ph8orp4/)

### 7. One-time immediate usage reset

- Google Antigravity, 2026-10-16, @antigravity (X): “@elizabethg61076 @joshwoodward @antigravity @officiallogank wow. that might of happened to me! think we need a reset of the argon usage!” [source](https://twitter.com/1074898346932752384/status/2111175901325271063)
- Google Antigravity, 2026-10-16, @antigravity (X): “@antigravity i blew through a week worth of tokens in one day, reset me!” [source](https://twitter.com/1742039820225175552/status/2111160798051492346)
- Google Antigravity, 2026-10-06, r/google_antigravity (Reddit): “exactly i felt the same for gemini it used shit tons of tokens yesterday, they should fix it asap and should give us a reset. and talking about claude its just for name sake i guess.” [source](https://www.reddit.com/r/google_antigravity/comments/1wygnf4/google_ai_pro_plan_decreased_antigravity_tokens/pe66hsn/)

### 8. Higher limits for specific models

- Google Antigravity, 2026-10-17, r/google_antigravity (Reddit): “once google fixes their usage limits argon will be better than claude, argon is much more capable able to fix issues opus was struggling with. once we get more usage limits for argon on pro i’m going to remove my claude subscription” [source](https://www.reddit.com/r/google_antigravity/comments/1x81ozy/is_this_time_to_switch_from_antigravvity/ph9q481/)
- Google Antigravity, 2026-10-16, r/google_antigravity (Reddit): “honestly, i'd rather have higher token li0mits with a decent model than a flagship model with restrictive usage caps” [source](https://www.reddit.com/r/google_antigravity/comments/1x75mgm/gemini_4_argon_gemini_38_flash_via_token_usage/)
- Google Antigravity, 2026-10-16, @antigravity (X): “@tigerjpeg @antigravity argon is such a good model that i burned through my quota in just a few turns —anyway, when does the quota reset? am i being too greedy? 🫪🫪🫪🫪🫪 i really, really need the kind of opus 5.5 capacity you get with a claude pro subscription.” [source](https://twitter.com/1895769938176225280/status/2111087795406270969)

### 9. Keep older models available

- Google Antigravity, 2026-10-18, @antigravity (X): “@antigravity it would have been better if sonnet 4.6 had remained available on promotional plans even after november 2, offering only 3.8 flash is such a bad decision” [source](https://twitter.com/1292582087426322432/status/2111839388871348707)
- Google Antigravity, 2026-10-16, r/google_antigravity (Reddit): “i really wish they didn't remove the 3.1 pro model in antigravity. i don't trust the flash models to do any work needing analytical depth, but i don't like the burn rates of argon.” [source](https://www.reddit.com/r/google_antigravity/comments/1x73yrd/my_thoughts_about_argon_4_in_antigravity_pro_user/ph613iw/)
- Google Antigravity, 2026-10-16, r/google_antigravity (Reddit): “so they removed 3.1 pro which had decent limits just to give us a tiny argon limit ? i would have preferred to keep 3.1 pro...” [source](https://www.reddit.com/r/google_antigravity/comments/1x73yrd/my_thoughts_about_argon_4_in_antigravity_pro_user/ph2a6ym/)

### 10. Restore removed models

- Google Antigravity, 2026-10-17, @antigravity (X): “@antigravity bring back 3.1 pro. argon was way too much for some simple task, flash on the other hand was not it for long task” [source](https://twitter.com/941670051060391936/status/2111500033157906638)
- Google Antigravity, 2026-10-15, r/google_antigravity (Reddit): “the real problem is not that 4 isn't available in antigravity for pro users, but that 3.1 pro has been removed. there's no model more suitable for planning available unless (i assume) you use a payg api key.” [source](https://www.reddit.com/r/google_antigravity/comments/1x6gz05/unacceptable_ai_pro_downgrade_antigravity_cli/pgz4ndq/)
- Google Antigravity, 2026-10-15, r/google_antigravity (Reddit): “3.8 is kind of just... the king of overcomplicating and getting everything wrong. it's pretty annoying imo. 3.7 was pretty dope. would like it back too.” [source](https://www.reddit.com/r/google_antigravity/comments/1x5yzgi/please_bring_back_gemini_37_flash/pgti28a/)

### 11. Opus 5.5 model support

- Google Antigravity, 2026-10-05, @antigravity (X): “@antigravity why i don't see opus 5.5 and sonet 5.5 ? [link]” [source](https://twitter.com/2807255978/status/2107159747921146304)
- Google Antigravity, 2026-10-03, r/google_antigravity (Reddit): “just saw the update that they released opus 5.5 in antigravity, but it is showing that it is only available for pro users while i am already on the pro plan. can someone help me regarding this?” [source](https://www.reddit.com/r/google_antigravity/comments/1wwko5h/no_opus_55_for_pro_users/)
- Google Antigravity, 2026-10-03, @antigravity (X): “.@antigravity i have ai pro because i pay for a google fi subscription and purchased a phone from google. that is not the same as a promo, that is a purchase add on. i'm also a paid cloud billing user with paid api keys. why can i not access opus 5.5 in antigravity?” [source](https://twitter.com/15338822/status/2106475109863076191)

### 12. Google/Gemini subscription usable in other harnesses

- Google Antigravity, 2026-10-16, @antigravity (X): “@googleai @sundarpichai @geminiapp we need an upgrade for google @antigravity so you use gemini 3.8 as a subagent and argon 4 as an orchstrator and while your on it maybe a sign in option for gemini user for hermes @nousresearch #feedback” [source](https://twitter.com/2028221376092581888/status/2111119549890531358)
- Google Antigravity, 2026-10-16, @antigravity (X): “@antigravity and aistudio?!? can we get at least some credit with our gemini pro plus subscription?????” [source](https://twitter.com/1836115356915539968/status/2110975698760307030)
- Google Antigravity, 2026-09-27, r/google_antigravity (Reddit): “google needs to remove the restriction of using google ai subscription only inside agy otherwise you get banned. gemini 3.8 is good but agy is kinda shitty would be cool to use the model in something like opencode” [source](https://www.reddit.com/r/google_antigravity/comments/1wrh0mx/gemini_38_in_alternative_harnesses/pcd2rek/)

## Ranks highest on

Quota reset timing and bonus or banked resets (2nd of 5), Quality got worse or better over time (3rd of 7)

## Ranks lowest on

IDE and editor integration (7th of 7), Which models are offered on a plan and when (11th of 11), Images, PDFs and file attachments as input (4th of 4)

Position on a criterion: its place among the agents with at least 30 rated user-weeks there, ordered by customer love. It ranks high when both its position and its 95% interval put it in the top half, low when both put it in the bottom half; neither otherwise, or when fewer than 4 agents qualify.

## All 63 criteria

Criterion love: 0.5 is the category norm. n: rated user-weeks.

### Paying and limits: 12th of 13 (customer love 0.418, n 2124)

Users describe quotas that drain fast and plans that are poor value. "Usage quota lasts" ranks last of 12, and users also complain about cutoffs in the middle of a task. Quota resets are the one strength, rated better than the category norm at 2nd of 5.

| Criterion | Reading | Customer love | 95% interval | n | Praise | Complaint |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [How much use a plan's price buys](https://feedbackbench.com/coding-agents/criteria/limits.plan_value.md) | 11th of 12 | 0.426 | 0.398–0.455 | 908 | 328 | 580 |
| [Single prompt, model or effort level consumes disproportionate quota](https://feedbackbench.com/coding-agents/criteria/limits.burn_rate.md) | 12th of 12 | 0.368 | 0.329–0.402 | 861 | 91 | 770 |
| [Price, allowance or plan terms changed](https://feedbackbench.com/coding-agents/criteria/limits.allowance_change.md) | 5th of 7 | 0.483 | 0.411–0.554 | 183 | 7 | 176 |
| [Short rolling usage window blocks or interrupts work](https://feedbackbench.com/coding-agents/criteria/limits.window_interrupts_work.md) | 6th of 6 | 0.420 | 0.392–0.451 | 174 | 10 | 164 |
| [Quota reset timing and bonus or banked resets](https://feedbackbench.com/coding-agents/criteria/limits.reset_schedule.md) | 2nd of 5 | 0.551 | 0.508–0.590 | 117 | 25 | 92 |
| [Free tier and free model availability and limits](https://feedbackbench.com/coding-agents/criteria/billing.free_tier.md) | 5th of 7 | 0.476 | 0.446–0.504 | 102 | 58 | 44 |
| [Usage meter visibility and accuracy](https://feedbackbench.com/coding-agents/criteria/limits.usage_meter.md) | 3rd of 6 | 0.504 | 0.461–0.551 | 76 | 8 | 68 |
| [Using an existing subscription across tools](https://feedbackbench.com/coding-agents/criteria/billing.subscription_portability.md) | 6th of 8 | 0.470 | 0.451–0.489 | 64 | 13 | 51 |
| [Pricing and plan terms stated clearly and consistently](https://feedbackbench.com/coding-agents/criteria/billing.pricing_clarity.md) | 5th of 6 | 0.470 | 0.437–0.513 | 61 | 2 | 59 |
| [Prompt cache hits, misses and invalidation](https://feedbackbench.com/coding-agents/criteria/limits.prompt_cache.md) | Too few posts | 0.495 | 0.483–0.506 | 8 | 1 | 7 |
| [Pay-as-you-go overage, fallback billing and spend caps](https://feedbackbench.com/coding-agents/criteria/billing.overage_charges.md) | Too few posts | 0.493 | 0.487–0.498 | 8 | 0 | 8 |

Most recent posts:

- Praise, 2026-10-18, r/google_antigravity (Reddit): “i use 3 plan and i have 75% of my weakly quota. granted its a decent size repo ran it on medium. i used flash high to execute. so it doesnt break the quota. i also use boost and it consume about the same percentage. so i guess its decent.” [source](https://www.reddit.com/r/google_antigravity/comments/1x8tyj9/how_much_usage_of_argon_is_expected_in_paid_pro/phfrq5q/)
- Praise, 2026-10-18, r/google_antigravity (Reddit): “i got it on a 2usd (/month) payment haha (including opus/sonnet 5.5 as well)” [source](https://www.reddit.com/r/google_antigravity/comments/1x93d48/is_gemini_4_argon_available_on_agy_with_the_74/phih6fm/)
- Praise, 2026-10-18, @antigravity (X): “antigravity tokens reset!! lets go!! free tokens. thanks @antigravity” [source](https://twitter.com/1569882137314136065/status/2111628818721157337)
- Complaint, 2026-10-18, r/google_antigravity (Reddit): “whenever i use team work my 5h limit just vanishes in an hour” [source](https://www.reddit.com/r/google_antigravity/comments/1x8c6ro/adding_these_three_at_the_end_of_any_prompt_my/phff3lc/)
- Complaint, 2026-10-18, r/google_antigravity (Reddit): “i had some dummy prs to test argon, one of them was to add a drop down menu to filter screen resolutions. it ate 45% of my weekly allocation of quota lmao. it actually stopped since i ran out, i'm assuming it would have taken even more if it ever got to the end.” [source](https://www.reddit.com/r/google_antigravity/comments/1x8x6nn/dont_worry_too_much_argon_its_genuinely_not_that/phgn112/)
- Complaint, 2026-10-18, r/google_antigravity (Reddit): “tried $100 plan. it has worse usage limits than $20 plans offered by competitors” [source](https://www.reddit.com/r/google_antigravity/comments/1x91yy3/is_argon_good/phhhfh9/)

### Setting up and connecting: 12th of 12 (customer love 0.356, n 627)

Users report trouble with install and sign-in and with IDE integration, and both criteria rank last. MCP and plugins also rank last of 9. Every setup criterion rates worse than the category norm.

| Criterion | Reading | Customer love | 95% interval | n | Praise | Complaint |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [IDE and editor integration](https://feedbackbench.com/coding-agents/criteria/setup.ide_integration.md) | 7th of 7 | 0.394 | 0.366–0.420 | 208 | 59 | 149 |
| [Install, launch and sign-in](https://feedbackbench.com/coding-agents/criteria/setup.install_signin.md) | 8th of 8 | 0.422 | 0.394–0.452 | 204 | 18 | 186 |
| [MCP servers, plugins, skills and hooks](https://feedbackbench.com/coding-agents/criteria/setup.extensions_mcp.md) | 9th of 9 | 0.445 | 0.419–0.472 | 148 | 48 | 100 |
| [Connecting own API keys, local models and custom endpoints](https://feedbackbench.com/coding-agents/criteria/setup.provider_byok_local.md) | 8th of 9 | 0.463 | 0.443–0.483 | 50 | 13 | 37 |
| [Onboarding, discoverability and documentation](https://feedbackbench.com/coding-agents/criteria/setup.onboarding_docs.md) | 6th of 7 | 0.474 | 0.459–0.490 | 42 | 4 | 38 |

Most recent posts:

- Praise, 2026-10-17, @antigravity (X): “@ryanthawks @tejas3732 @antigravity @geminiapp fwiw i had zero issues installing agy (or anything else) via the shell script.” [source](https://twitter.com/1855659190049796096/status/2111279389799231674)
- Praise, 2026-10-13, r/google_antigravity (Reddit): “i'm on linux mint and doesnt have problem to install or update it. idk what u mean.” [source](https://www.reddit.com/r/google_antigravity/comments/1x0r63k/ide_or_cli/pgfr1xg/)
- Praise, 2026-10-06, @antigravity (X): “@googleai @googleaistudio @antigravity @firebase it is exciting to connect all the way from antigravity to firebase. i am truly grateful for the evolution that shortens the distance from idea to publication.” [source](https://twitter.com/1992425345514135552/status/2107394346328961105)
- Complaint, 2026-10-18, @antigravity (X): “@joesparks @antigravity thanks! yes. the "out of box experience" needs some love” [source](https://twitter.com/190654997/status/2111666299025990095)
- Complaint, 2026-10-18, @antigravity (X): “@antigravity why i don't know but antigravity these days is always giving me this error while i open it, everytime it asks for sign in ... [link]” [source](https://twitter.com/2066942435721379840/status/2111750202017398997)
- Complaint, 2026-10-17, r/GoogleAntigravityIDE (Reddit): “i use the ide with ssh to work on remote folders.. agy can't do that yet...” [source](https://www.reddit.com/r/GoogleAntigravityIDE/comments/1x70zvj/gemini_4_argon_is_officially_on_antigravity_but/phcm4la/)

### Choosing models: 12th of 12 (customer love 0.338, n 1345)

Users discuss models 2.0 times as often as for other agents, mostly to complain. Access drives it: "Offers the models you want" has love of 0.241, last of 11, and users say paid plans lack Argon. On whether quality holds up, views are mixed and sit near the norm.

| Criterion | Reading | Customer love | 95% interval | n | Praise | Complaint |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [Which models are offered on a plan and when](https://feedbackbench.com/coding-agents/criteria/models.catalog_access.md) | 11th of 11 | 0.241 | 0.219–0.268 | 790 | 71 | 719 |
| [Quality got worse or better over time](https://feedbackbench.com/coding-agents/criteria/models.quality_drift.md) | 3rd of 7 | 0.535 | 0.500–0.570 | 490 | 152 | 338 |
| [Automatic model routing and fallback](https://feedbackbench.com/coding-agents/criteria/models.routing_auto.md) | 7th of 8 | 0.461 | 0.440–0.483 | 67 | 10 | 57 |
| [Reasoning effort setting and its defaults](https://feedbackbench.com/coding-agents/criteria/models.effort_control.md) | 3rd of 4 | 0.485 | 0.465–0.507 | 65 | 28 | 37 |

Most recent posts:

- Praise, 2026-10-18, r/google_antigravity (Reddit): “sounds more like your repo is poor and has a bunch of old information, causing the model to perform poorly, like the made up index column. for me at least argon is a big improvement.” [source](https://www.reddit.com/r/google_antigravity/comments/1x8x6nn/dont_worry_too_much_argon_its_genuinely_not_that/phhv04u/)
- Praise, 2026-10-17, r/google_antigravity (Reddit): “even in chat argon is good tho tbh i will use it as a research and flash models will be my go to” [source](https://www.reddit.com/r/google_antigravity/comments/1x7qnlw/were_cooked/ph8dpq4/)
- Praise, 2026-10-17, r/google_antigravity (Reddit): “same here. but to be fair, i still find flash good enough for my task. now with less flash users, it might get much faster.” [source](https://www.reddit.com/r/google_antigravity/comments/1x7qnlw/were_cooked/ph9hgk7/)
- Complaint, 2026-10-18, r/google_antigravity (Reddit): “for me, my personal experience with antigravity is an an ultimate low. i am still locked out of argon everywhere (antigravity desktop and cli) except for gemini with my paid pro account.” [source](https://www.reddit.com/r/google_antigravity/comments/1x8unih/watching_google_ais_reputation_bounce_back_and/phgfjtr/)
- Complaint, 2026-10-18, r/google_antigravity (Reddit): “i think google label is "high" or "3.8" to make user think it is an upgrade. actually they reduce the context count or horsepower in the back and make everything so bad now” [source](https://www.reddit.com/r/google_antigravity/comments/1x8y4ap/wth_is_happening_with_gemini_38_flash/phi675m/)
- Complaint, 2026-10-18, r/google_antigravity (Reddit): “3.1 pro might have been awesome, in february. it sure as hell was not when it got discontinued.” [source](https://www.reddit.com/r/google_antigravity/comments/1x8unih/watching_google_ais_reputation_bounce_back_and/phi90jm/)

### Instructing and context: 11th of 11 (customer love 0.388, n 526)

Users say it misses the right files and loses focus in long sessions. "Finds the right files" and "Stays sharp in long sessions" both rank last. Following instructions and following project rules both sit near the norm.

| Criterion | Reading | Customer love | 95% interval | n | Praise | Complaint |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [Direct in-prompt instructions and caps are followed](https://feedbackbench.com/coding-agents/criteria/context.instruction_following.md) | 5th of 5 | 0.469 | 0.440–0.499 | 162 | 34 | 128 |
| [Output degrades as the context window fills](https://feedbackbench.com/coding-agents/criteria/context.long_context_decay.md) | 5th of 5 | 0.467 | 0.442–0.498 | 94 | 10 | 84 |
| [Finding the right files in the codebase](https://feedbackbench.com/coding-agents/criteria/context.codebase_retrieval.md) | 5th of 5 | 0.440 | 0.416–0.461 | 74 | 15 | 59 |
| [Persistent project rules files are read and obeyed](https://feedbackbench.com/coding-agents/criteria/context.instruction_files.md) | 4th of 5 | 0.482 | 0.461–0.504 | 71 | 32 | 39 |
| [Memory and state carried across sessions](https://feedbackbench.com/coding-agents/criteria/context.session_memory.md) | 5th of 6 | 0.461 | 0.441–0.481 | 62 | 12 | 50 |
| [Images, PDFs and file attachments as input](https://feedbackbench.com/coding-agents/criteria/context.attachments.md) | 4th of 4 | 0.453 | 0.434–0.471 | 53 | 7 | 46 |
| [Context compaction keeps what matters, cheaply and quickly](https://feedbackbench.com/coding-agents/criteria/context.compaction.md) | 4th of 5 | 0.480 | 0.464–0.499 | 45 | 9 | 36 |
| [Asks the user versus guessing](https://feedbackbench.com/coding-agents/criteria/context.clarifying_questions.md) | Too few posts | 0.513 | 0.499–0.530 | 19 | 11 | 8 |

Most recent posts:

- Praise, 2026-10-17, r/google_antigravity (Reddit): “/grill-me is also amazing if youre prompt is weak or you don't know the exact word to express the feature you want” [source](https://www.reddit.com/r/google_antigravity/comments/1x8c6ro/adding_these_three_at_the_end_of_any_prompt_my/phbfrn5/)
- Praise, 2026-10-16, r/google_antigravity (Reddit): “i've noticed that it follows the assigned prompt quite faithfully, more so than flash, even at a low reasoning level.” [source](https://www.reddit.com/r/google_antigravity/comments/1x7os0j/gemini_38_flash_with_images/ph5zrbo/)
- Praise, 2026-10-16, @antigravity (X): “@antigravity @claudeai of course, @claudeai and @chatgpt are also the best. but, according to me, i don't have to describe in detail to gemini to start off. it can able to understand where the conversation is going towards.” [source](https://twitter.com/2108765350275985408/status/2110950863934283911)
- Complaint, 2026-10-18, r/google_antigravity (Reddit): “it contradicts itself and loses the plot on long context tasks. i really do not see any reason to use this model, specially now that deepseek v4.1 flash 1017 is available.” [source](https://www.reddit.com/r/google_antigravity/comments/1x8x6nn/dont_worry_too_much_argon_its_genuinely_not_that/phgirsx/)
- Complaint, 2026-10-18, r/google_antigravity (Reddit): “this is definitely a major issue. like even 6 month old models will look in a certain place if you tell them. but not gemini, it'll scan your whole api code when you just needed a simple ui fix.” [source](https://www.reddit.com/r/google_antigravity/comments/1x8x6nn/dont_worry_too_much_argon_its_genuinely_not_that/phgsipn/)
- Complaint, 2026-10-18, r/google_antigravity (Reddit): “it does this audits in my case as well. despite instructed not to do it. but it's the first time i use it” [source](https://www.reddit.com/r/google_antigravity/comments/1x9d6bg/problems_with_flash_38_after_argon_4_release/phkfhzu/)

### Doing the work: 14th of 14 (customer love 0.352, n 2380)

Users say it cannot handle their kind of task. That is the largest criterion in this area, and it ranks last of 13. Users raise permission prompts 4.45 times as often as for other agents, and that criterion ranks last of 5.

| Criterion | Reading | Customer love | 95% interval | n | Praise | Complaint |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [Can do the user's kind of task](https://feedbackbench.com/coding-agents/criteria/work.capability.md) | 13th of 13 | 0.325 | 0.303–0.346 | 1419 | 657 | 762 |
| [Tool approval prompts and autonomy modes](https://feedbackbench.com/coding-agents/criteria/work.permission_prompts.md) | 5th of 5 | 0.379 | 0.353–0.406 | 253 | 19 | 234 |
| [Spins, loops or gets stuck without progress](https://feedbackbench.com/coding-agents/criteria/work.stuck_loops.md) | 4th of 6 | 0.473 | 0.410–0.539 | 188 | 6 | 182 |
| [Subagents, parallel agents and orchestrators](https://feedbackbench.com/coding-agents/criteria/work.multi_agent_orchestration.md) | 8th of 10 | 0.480 | 0.452–0.509 | 166 | 96 | 70 |
| [Plan-before-edit mode](https://feedbackbench.com/coding-agents/criteria/work.plan_mode.md) | 5th of 5 | 0.466 | 0.436–0.494 | 116 | 56 | 60 |
| [Does unrequested work or over-engineers](https://feedbackbench.com/coding-agents/criteria/work.scope_overreach.md) | 3rd of 5 | 0.512 | 0.456–0.574 | 99 | 7 | 92 |
| [Breaks existing code or reintroduces bugs](https://feedbackbench.com/coding-agents/criteria/work.regressions_introduced.md) | 2nd of 5 | 0.506 | 0.467–0.553 | 81 | 7 | 74 |
| [Risky or irreversible actions without confirmation](https://feedbackbench.com/coding-agents/criteria/work.destructive_actions.md) | 5th of 5 | 0.467 | 0.448–0.486 | 75 | 8 | 67 |
| [Frontend and visual UI output](https://feedbackbench.com/coding-agents/criteria/work.frontend_ui.md) | 4th of 5 | 0.498 | 0.473–0.525 | 72 | 33 | 39 |
| [Computer use and browser control](https://feedbackbench.com/coding-agents/criteria/work.computer_browser_use.md) | 3rd of 4 | 0.474 | 0.452–0.497 | 62 | 24 | 38 |
| [Long unattended runs and goal/loop mode](https://feedbackbench.com/coding-agents/criteria/work.long_running_autonomy.md) | 6th of 8 | 0.485 | 0.456–0.513 | 60 | 41 | 19 |
| [Diagnosing and fixing reported bugs](https://feedbackbench.com/coding-agents/criteria/work.bug_diagnosis.md) | 4th of 4 | 0.470 | 0.443–0.495 | 45 | 22 | 23 |
| [Safety filters block legitimate coding tasks](https://feedbackbench.com/coding-agents/criteria/work.safety_refusals.md) | 3rd of 5 | 0.509 | 0.484–0.537 | 33 | 6 | 27 |
| [Games checks instead of fixing the problem](https://feedbackbench.com/coding-agents/criteria/work.reward_hacking.md) | 1st of 3 | 0.511 | 0.470–0.602 | 32 | 1 | 31 |
| [Length and clarity of replies, summaries and comments](https://feedbackbench.com/coding-agents/criteria/work.response_verbosity.md) | Too few posts | 0.523 | 0.506–0.544 | 25 | 14 | 11 |
| [Stops mid-task or answers instead of acting](https://feedbackbench.com/coding-agents/criteria/work.premature_stop.md) | Too few posts | 0.481 | 0.472–0.489 | 21 | 0 | 21 |
| [Git commits, branches and sync](https://feedbackbench.com/coding-agents/criteria/work.git_workflow.md) | Too few posts | 0.493 | 0.482–0.504 | 17 | 4 | 13 |
| [Caves to or argues with the user's judgement](https://feedbackbench.com/coding-agents/criteria/work.sycophancy_pushback.md) | Too few posts | 0.500 | 0.487–0.517 | 17 | 4 | 13 |

Most recent posts:

- Praise, 2026-10-18, r/google_antigravity (Reddit): “i use the opposite approach, get flash to do the leg work and argon to go over looking for blind spots and make refinenments. so far so good.” [source](https://www.reddit.com/r/google_antigravity/comments/1x91yy3/is_argon_good/phhi99y/)
- Praise, 2026-10-18, @antigravity (X): “i just built airdrop from my iphone to my linux desktop with gemini on @antigravity. same one click and instantly opens files and websites i didn’t expect it to actually work, just sent one prompt, went to dinner, and it was up and running when i came back. like magic 🥹” [source](https://twitter.com/1699527254265794560/status/2111646872838582354)
- Praise, 2026-10-17, r/google_antigravity (Reddit): “i recommend the following for best usage: argon 4 low/medium does the planning, it makes a plan, (use /plan), and then 3.8 flash does the implementation. works really well, and argon is very specific, even on low, with things to do. incredible combo and very cost effective” [source](https://www.reddit.com/r/google_antigravity/comments/1x85wr2/has_anyone_else_noticed_an_improvement_in/phc7wda/)
- Complaint, 2026-10-18, r/google_antigravity (Reddit): “what "frontier" work are you actually doing with it? for context i'm working with a large monorepo with multiple micro services and argon is outright unusable.” [source](https://www.reddit.com/r/google_antigravity/comments/1x8x6nn/dont_worry_too_much_argon_its_genuinely_not_that/phgs710/)
- Complaint, 2026-10-18, r/google_antigravity (Reddit): “i tried a task i've done dozens of times today and it had no clue what to do... odd” [source](https://www.reddit.com/r/google_antigravity/comments/1x8y4ap/wth_is_happening_with_gemini_38_flash/phgs7m9/)
- Complaint, 2026-10-18, r/google_antigravity (Reddit): “you are crazy! 3.8 messing up a lot here. i have him implement and gpt to correct. there hasn't been a single time when he managed to implement anything without coming back with an error.” [source](https://www.reddit.com/r/google_antigravity/comments/1x97wfi/argon_best_model_ive_used_but_not_useful_for_pro/phjcc8u/)

### Checking and finishing: 9th of 9 (customer love 0.387, n 176)

Users say it claims work is done when it is not. "Honest about 'done'" comes up 3.59 times as often as for other agents. "Tests its own work" ranks 2nd of 3 but still rates worse than the category norm.

| Criterion | Reading | Customer love | 95% interval | n | Praise | Complaint |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [Claims work is done or fixed when it is not](https://feedbackbench.com/coding-agents/criteria/verify.false_completion.md) | 3rd of 4 | 0.451 | 0.426–0.490 | 91 | 1 | 90 |
| [Reviewing and approving the agent's changes](https://feedbackbench.com/coding-agents/criteria/verify.change_review_ui.md) | 3rd of 5 | 0.486 | 0.468–0.503 | 35 | 10 | 25 |
| [Builds, tests or runs its own changes](https://feedbackbench.com/coding-agents/criteria/verify.self_testing.md) | 2nd of 3 | 0.481 | 0.463–0.498 | 31 | 13 | 18 |
| [Agent-performed code review finds real issues](https://feedbackbench.com/coding-agents/criteria/verify.agent_code_review.md) | Too few posts | 0.467 | 0.439–0.493 | 26 | 12 | 14 |

Most recent posts:

- Praise, 2026-10-16, @antigravity (X): “@antigravity @google @sundarpichai no fu**ing way... fable 5.1 on high has admitted that “argon's review is largely valid. i've reviewed the points raised against the code and updated the document.” argon had to improve on fable's plan.” [source](https://twitter.com/1721590682953859072/status/2111060435613225076)
- Praise, 2026-10-10, @antigravity (X): “@antigravity pulling designs, building native components, verifying in an emulator and running tests is the full loop rather than a code snippet. closing verification inside the agent flow is what separates a coding demo from something you can merge.” [source](https://twitter.com/1985864228339924995/status/2108932911617769799)
- Praise, 2026-10-03, r/google_antigravity (Reddit): “yeah, i've used it to very good effect to audit code made by gemini 3.8. i'm going to use the new models for the initial planning and layout side of things, then use gemini for execution.” [source](https://www.reddit.com/r/google_antigravity/comments/1wwol9k/seriously_whats_the_point_of_having_claude_models/pdnx7ko/)
- Complaint, 2026-10-16, @antigravity (X): “@antigravity but why gemini do i give task edit it's done as compare to other first think where and which then edit and test then gives , so fix your system prompts related that.” [source](https://twitter.com/2077305807457411073/status/2110890762770829379)
- Complaint, 2026-10-13, r/google_antigravity (Reddit): “of all the sessions i've had with claude this amount of hallucinated confidence never happened at the level that keeps happening with gemini but eh, who cares” [source](https://www.reddit.com/r/google_antigravity/comments/1x33an3/unpopular_opinion_90_of_the_hate_toward_google/pghufww/)
- Complaint, 2026-10-12, r/google_antigravity (Reddit): “i can tell on low level things it's not good he will tell you he did everything but when you start testing you will see there is soo much stuff he will fix it again! so i think we will wait for agron! aka pro 4” [source](https://www.reddit.com/r/google_antigravity/comments/1x2984s/how_complex_is_too_complex_for_flash_38/pfepzyy/)

### Interface and sessions: 14th of 14 (customer love 0.399, n 472)

Users talk about the interface less than for other agents. Complaints centre on display and settings and on session history, and both rank last. Mobile and remote control sits near the norm.

| Criterion | Reading | Customer love | 95% interval | n | Praise | Complaint |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [How the interface shows work, and what the user can configure](https://feedbackbench.com/coding-agents/criteria/ui.display_settings.md) | 12th of 12 | 0.414 | 0.386–0.444 | 254 | 49 | 205 |
| [Mobile, remote-control and voice access](https://feedbackbench.com/coding-agents/criteria/surfaces.remote_mobile.md) | 6th of 7 | 0.492 | 0.464–0.519 | 111 | 59 | 52 |
| [Saving, switching, resuming and rewinding sessions](https://feedbackbench.com/coding-agents/criteria/ui.session_history.md) | 6th of 6 | 0.441 | 0.421–0.463 | 89 | 9 | 80 |
| [Stopping and steering a running agent](https://feedbackbench.com/coding-agents/criteria/ui.interrupt_steer.md) | Too few posts | 0.495 | 0.483–0.506 | 22 | 9 | 13 |
| [Cloud and remote sandbox execution](https://feedbackbench.com/coding-agents/criteria/surfaces.cloud_sessions.md) | Too few posts | 0.498 | 0.483–0.512 | 22 | 11 | 11 |

Most recent posts:

- Praise, 2026-10-17, @antigravity (X): “got a chromebook hanging around sleeping? keep it open, install linux, install @antigravity, then setup remote control and have it build things for you with gemini 4 argon, all from your phone. i've been having it make and install custom watch faces for my @google pixel watch.” [source](https://twitter.com/2070686785227612162/status/2111491729207537944)
- Praise, 2026-10-14, @antigravity (X): “@seraandroid @rseroter @antigravity remote control is my favourite feature launch of 2026. having access to my coding agent from my phone has been so cool. there have been plenty of times where i'm out and have a cool idea to build out. remote control makes that easy!” [source](https://twitter.com/68870728/status/2110245573408477326)
- Praise, 2026-10-14, @antigravity (X): “this is rad! 🤯 i now have my own, private @antigravity remote control. using the watcher script and a bit of scripting i can now talk on one machine using speech-to-text, and get the content automatically submitted in an instance of 2.0. #buildinpublic [link]” [source](https://twitter.com/112247147/status/2110404817348603906)
- Complaint, 2026-10-18, @antigravity (X): “@_mohansolo @antigravity agy doesn't seem to have ctrl+r history search? and i can't send a pr because it's not open source? wtf folks 😭” [source](https://twitter.com/1853296525373546496/status/2111635455406198848)
- Complaint, 2026-10-18, @antigravity (X): “tried agy on cli for gemini 4 and it cuts off some long lines in answers with ellipses. wut @_mohansolo @antigravity” [source](https://twitter.com/972383157214474241/status/2111688430589751477)
- Complaint, 2026-10-17, r/google_antigravity (Reddit): “same here, even for newly created chats after a couple of hours they dissapear” [source](https://www.reddit.com/r/google_antigravity/comments/1x84imq/after_antigravity_140_update/phb87fd/)

### Reliability and speed: 10th of 13 (customer love 0.493, n 1274)

This is the only area where customer love is not clearly below the category norm. Slow responses drive it, raised 1.92 times as often as for other agents. Crashes and outages draw complaints, but "Updates don't break things" ranks 2nd of 7.

| Criterion | Reading | Customer love | 95% interval | n | Praise | Complaint |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [Latency, throughput and fast mode](https://feedbackbench.com/coding-agents/criteria/rel.response_speed.md) | 9th of 10 | 0.464 | 0.429–0.496 | 760 | 206 | 554 |
| [Client crashes, freezes and failed tool execution](https://feedbackbench.com/coding-agents/criteria/rel.client_failures.md) | 10th of 11 | 0.433 | 0.384–0.483 | 315 | 13 | 302 |
| [Outages, server errors and capacity or rate errors](https://feedbackbench.com/coding-agents/criteria/rel.service_errors.md) | 6th of 6 | 0.454 | 0.408–0.502 | 194 | 8 | 186 |
| [Updates break working setups](https://feedbackbench.com/coding-agents/criteria/rel.update_breakage.md) | 2nd of 7 | 0.516 | 0.474–0.560 | 110 | 17 | 93 |

Most recent posts:

- Praise, 2026-10-18, @antigravity (X): “@mcnabbd @antigravity yeah, that was it. now it's flying. it's going really fast over here in chrome. i was just seeing it without the gpu. sorry about that 😅” [source](https://twitter.com/14917788/status/2111685879920214255)
- Praise, 2026-10-13, r/google_antigravity (Reddit): “for me it is fast, on ultra 20 for context, i mean compared to opus 5.5 or gpt” [source](https://www.reddit.com/r/google_antigravity/comments/1x53uib/gemini_4_argon/pgj53el/)
- Praise, 2026-10-13, @antigravity (X): “@rseroter @antigravity i have been a regular user since may 2026. the improvements recently have made agy a much better experience. and, in my experience, it is does not lag at all (compared to codex at least).” [source](https://twitter.com/1831050659967250432/status/2110033284960800768)
- Complaint, 2026-10-18, @antigravity (X): “@jhny__5 @antigravity @googleai @googledevs antigravity ide is not working use there harness” [source](https://twitter.com/1723343059008770048/status/2111874041791631855)
- Complaint, 2026-10-18, @antigravity (X): “@antigravity just a heads up: the multi-agent validation run generated over 405 execution steps, 400kb of raw jsonl logs, and rendered multiple image outputs. the electron/chromium ui renderer encountered a gpu/memory freeze while rendering the high-density streaming logs.” [source](https://twitter.com/3468547097/status/2111927471558045842)
- Complaint, 2026-10-18, @antigravity (X): “@antigravity i had a long session that didn't overuse anything, and when i came back my agy was a blank screen.” [source](https://twitter.com/3468547097/status/2111927593918468209)

### Account and support: 10th of 11 (customer love 0.430, n 258)

Users discuss support and accounts less than for other agents. Bans and restrictions draw the most complaints, raised 2.3 times as often as for other agents. Helpful support sits near the norm, 5th of 8.

| Criterion | Reading | Customer love | 95% interval | n | Praise | Complaint |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [Account bans and access restrictions](https://feedbackbench.com/coding-agents/criteria/account.bans_restrictions.md) | 4th of 5 | 0.449 | 0.428–0.479 | 122 | 4 | 118 |
| [Support, refunds and issue handling](https://feedbackbench.com/coding-agents/criteria/account.support.md) | 5th of 8 | 0.483 | 0.452–0.515 | 99 | 12 | 87 |
| [Data retention, training use and deployment isolation](https://feedbackbench.com/coding-agents/criteria/account.data_privacy.md) | Too few posts | 0.484 | 0.473–0.496 | 27 | 1 | 26 |
| [Wrong charges, failed payments and plan provisioning](https://feedbackbench.com/coding-agents/criteria/account.billing_errors.md) | Too few posts | 0.477 | 0.468–0.486 | 26 | 0 | 26 |

Most recent posts:

- Praise, 2026-10-08, @antigravity (X): “@vznrw @vzniedersachsen @google @antigravity has given the chillguy account the €5.59 back - i can't find the post anymore, i just had a limit, i'm still shocked 🤯 but it's very good 🥹😊 [link]” [source](https://twitter.com/1897779361178148864/status/2108005654111650089)
- Praise, 2026-10-03, @antigravity (X): “@antigravity @_mohansolo i'm gonna assume my rant made them correct it. thanks @antigravity ily [link]” [source](https://twitter.com/1751885469233942528/status/2106323910182731923)
- Praise, 2026-09-30, @antigravity (X): “i appreciate you @google for unticking the data use box by default in @antigravity [link]” [source](https://twitter.com/2079329580654153728/status/2105411061511852428)
- Complaint, 2026-10-18, @antigravity (X): “@antigravity i paid for the 100 plan and an hour later upgraded to the 200 plan. did i not get credit for the 100? just got charged 300” [source](https://twitter.com/2033811870260596737/status/2111868942151254181)
- Complaint, 2026-10-17, r/google_antigravity (Reddit): “i subscribed as a student and there's no way to cancel or opt-out , i can't get argon or do my researches. i can't even pay extra to get the paid pro plan i'm just stuck with it now.” [source](https://www.reddit.com/r/google_antigravity/comments/1x7o84m/sorry_google_i_will_be_careful_now_and_not_take/phaa0gf/)
- Complaint, 2026-10-17, r/google_antigravity (Reddit): “[link] i’ve had the 18-month pro plan for a year now, but it’s still not active for me.” [source](https://www.reddit.com/r/google_antigravity/comments/1x8aaby/is_gemini_4_argon_available_on_google_antigravity/phc3s25/)